Relationships Between Patients and Healthcare Staff in the Experiences of Women Planning a Vaginal Birth After Caesarean (VBAC). A Qualitative Analysis of Narratives

Joanna Małgorzata Księska-Koszałka, Mateusz Dudka

Abstract


Research and clinical practice show that there is a relatively large group of women who, having had a caesarean section, are keen to give birth naturally the next time. These preferences are driven not only by health considerations, but also by the patients’ needs, expectations and values. In the practice of Polish hospitals and based on the experiences of selected patients, it appears that this type of birth is met with varying attitudes amongst medical staff, which affect the communication relationship between the pregnant woman and the medical staff. The aim of this article is a qualita tive analysis of selected statements by patients wishing to give birth naturally following a previous caesarean section, and their evaluation in the light of the well-being of pregnant patients. Reflective thematic analysis was used in our own research. The patients’ narratives show that a lack of attention to the quality of communication by medical staff can lead to increased anxiety, a loss of a sense of security and a reduction in trust. The results indicate that for some women, VBAC is not only an alternative method of delivery but also an important element in building autonomy.

Keywords


vaginal birth after caesarian; patient-physician relationship; communication; the matic analysis

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Attanasio, L.B., Kozhimannil, K.B., Kjerulff, K.H. (2019). Women’s Preference for Vaginal Birth After a First Delivery by Cesarean. Birth, 46(1), 51–60. DOI: 10.1111/birt.12386.

Basile Ibrahim, B., Kennedy, H.P., Whittemore, R. (2020). Women’s Perceptions of Barriers and Facilitators to Vaginal Birth After Cesarean in the United States: An Integrative Review. Journal of Midwifery and Women’s Health, 65(3), 349–361. DOI: 10.1111/jmwh.13083.

Black, M., Entwistle, V.A., Bhattacharya, S., Gillies, K. (2016). Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section: Why Is Uptake So Low? Insights from a Meta-Ethnographic Synthesis of Women’s Accounts of Their Birth Choices. BMJ Open, 6(1). DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008881.

Bohren, M.A., Vogel, J.P., Hunter, E.C., Lutsiv, O., Makh, S.K., Souza, J.P., Aguiar, C., Saraiva Coneglian, F., Diniz, A.L., Tunçalp, Ö., Javadi, D., Oladapo, O.T., Khosla, R., Hindin, M.J., Gülmezoglu, A.M. (2015). The Mistreatment of Women During Childbirth in Health Facilities Globally: A Mixed-Methods Systematic Review. PLoS Med. 30;12(6):e1001847; discussion e1001847. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001847. PMID: 26126110; PMCID: PMC4488322.

Braun, V., Clarke, V. (2006). Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.

Cosmai, G., Biondini, M., Panzeri, M., Serafini, M., Lambicchi, L., Locatelli, A., …, Fumagalli, S. (2025). The Decision-Making Process in the Choice of VBAC: Facilitators and Barriers from Women’s Perception, a Systematic Review. European Journal of Midwifery, 9, 10–18332. DOI: 10.18332/ejm/205874

Davis, D., Homer, C.S., Clack, D., Turkmani, S., Foureur, M. (2020). Choosing Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section: Motivating Factors. Midwifery, 88, 102766. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2020.102766.

Doroszewska, A., Nowakowski, M. (2017). Medykalizacja opieki okołoporodowej w Polsce. Zdrowie Publiczne i Zarządzanie, 15(2), 172–177. DOI:10.4467/20842627OZ.17.019.6789.

Gajewska, M. (2012). Położnicza polisemia. Medykalizacja i demedykalizacja jako ekstrema wyznaczające przestrzeń doświadczenia współczesnego rytuału przejścia. W: M. Synowiec--Piłat, A. Olchowska-Kotala (red.), Socjologia i psychologia dla pacjenta. Wybrane zagadnienia (s. 229–244). Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.

Hul, M. (2023). VBAC, czyli poród drogami natury po przebytym uprzednio cięciu cesarskim. Fundacja Rodzić po Ludzku.

Keedle, H., Schmied, V., Burns, E., Dahlen, H.G. (2019). A Narrative Analysis of Women’s Experiences of Planning a Vaginal Birth After Caesarean (VBAC) in Australia Using Critical Feminist Theory. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 19, 142. DOI: 10.1186/s12884-019-2297-4.

Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej z dnia 2 kwietnia 1997 r. (Dz.U. Nr 78, poz. 483).

Lundgren, I., Begley, C., Gross, M.M., Bondas, T. (2012). ‘Groping Through the Fog’: a Metasynthesis of Women’s Experiences on VBAC (Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section). BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 12(1), 85. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2393-12-85.

Martel, M.J., MacKinnon, C.J. (2005). Guidelines for Vaginal Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Canada, 26(7), 660–683. DOI: 10.1016/s1701-2163(16)30188-8.

Meddings, F., Phipps, F.M., Haith‐Cooper, M., Haigh, J. (2007). Vaginal Birth After Caesarean Section (VBAC): Exploring Women’s Perceptions. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 16(1), 160–167. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2005.01496.x.

Ministerstwo Zdrowia (2026). Czym jest opieka okołoporodowa? https://pacjent.gov.pl/aktualnosc/czym-jest-opieka-okoloporodowa (dostęp: 13.06.2026).

Munro, S., Janssen, P., Corbett, K., Wilcox, E., Bansback, N., Kornelsen, J. (2017). Seeking Control in the Midst of Uncertainty: Women’s Experiences of Choosing Mode of Birth After Caesarean . Women and Birth, 30(2), 129–136. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2016.10.005.

Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., Ranfagni, S. (2023). A Step-by-Step Process of Thematic Analysis to Develop a Conceptual Model in Qualitative Research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–8. DOI: 10.1177/16094069231205789.

Naturalnie po cesarce (n.d.). http://naturalniepocesarce.pl/ (dostęp: 22.05.2026).

Nilsson, C., van Limbeek, E., Vehvilainen-Julkunen, K., Lundgren, I. (2017). Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: Views of Women from Countries with High VBAC Rates. Qualitative health research, 27(3), 325–340. DOI: 10.1016/j.wombi.2017.04.009.

Ogińska-Bulik, N., Juczyński, Z. (2010). Osobowość, stres a zdrowie. Warszawa: Difin.

Robinson, J.H., Callister, L.C., Berry, J.A., Dearing, K.A. (2008). Patient-Centered Care and Adherence: Definitions and Applications to Improve Outcomes. Journal of the American Association of Nurse Practitioners, 20(12), 600–607. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2008.00360.x.

Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (2015). Birth After Previous Caesarean Birth (Green-top Guideline No. 45).

Rozporządzenie Ministra Zdrowia z dnia 23 października 2025 r. zmieniające rozporządzenie w sprawie standardu organizacyjnego opieki okołoporodowej (Dz.U. 2025 poz. 1525).

Salmon, P. (2002). Psychologia w medycynie. Wspomaga współpracę z pacjentem i proces leczenia. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.

Shurong, Z., Li, M., Jie, X. (2024). Decision‐Making Experiences and the Need for Decision Aids in Women Considering Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Qualitative Meta‐Synthesis. Birth, 51(1), 3–12. https://doi.org/10.1111/birt.12764.

Simeone, S., Stile, F., Assunta, G., Gargiulo, G., Rea, T. (2019). Experience of Vaginal Birth After Cesarean: A Phenomenological Study. The Journal of Perinatal Education, 28(3), 131. DOI: 10.1891/1058-1243.28.3.131.

Statystkiporodow.pl. https://statystykiporodow.pl/ (dostęp: 12.06.2026).

Sys, D., Baranowska, B., Kajdy, A., Tataj-Puzyna, U., Gotlib, J., Bączek, G., Rabijewski, M. (2022). Poglądy i preferencje kobiet dotyczące sposobu porodu po cięciu cesarskim: Polskie badanie przekrojowe. European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 273, 26–32. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2022.04.006.

Sys, D., Baranowska, B., Tataj-Puzyna, U., Kajdy, A. (2019). Możliwości wyboru drogi porodu po cesarskim cięciu: najnowsze rekomendacje. Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio, 39(3), 125–133. DOI: 10.34766/fetr.v3i39.126.

Wielgoś, M., Bomba-Opoń, D., Breborowicz, G.H., Czajkowski, K., Dębski, R., Leszczynska--Gorzelak, B., Zimmer, M. (2018). Recommendations of the Polish Society of Gynecologists and Obstetricians regarding caesarean sections. Ginekologia Polska, 89(11), 644–657. DOI: 10.5603/GP.a2018.0110.

World Health Organization (2018). WHO Recommendations on Intrapartum Care for a Positive Childbirth Experience . World Health Organization.

Zarząd Główny Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego (2008). Cięcie cesarskie. Rekomendacje Polskiego Towarzystwa Ginekologicznego . Polskie Towarzystwo Ginekologiczne




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2026.39.2.95-117
Date of publication: 2026-08-07 08:47:59
Date of submission: 2026-05-27 23:19:10


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Joanna Małgorzata Księska-Koszałka, Mateusz Dudka

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.