Main tendencies in the policy of electoral reforms in the parliamentary elections

Wojciech Sokół

Abstract


In some political and science circles (including Poland) there are articulated views on the crucial role of electoral systems in the process of political competition. Therefore they express the opinion about prevalence of certain electoral arrangements in terms of the implementation of certain political preferences. Often hopes for the reform of the political system are associated with the changes of the electoral systems. In the Great Britain (the United Kingdom) and other English-speaking countries citizens have formed community associations whose aim is the change from the majority to the proportional electoral system. In the effect we have more proportional election result and extension of real electoral bid to a  larger number of political parties. On the other hand, in Poland, we have seen the opposite trend. Proponents of single-mandate constituencies depreciate the system of proportional representation. They express the belief in the positive effects of the majority system in the parliamentary elections. Radicals endorse the idea that only those electoral solutions are synonymous with electoral democracy and they are a  way to reduce the pathologies of political life. In terms of these issues there have arisen many misconceptions and political myths. The main purpose of this article is to pay attention to trends in the areas of electoral reforms in the world. The author tries to answer the following research questions: 1) What electoral systems were popular in the world in individual periods from the 19th to the 21st centuries? 2) What tendencies appear in changes of electoral systems in the recent years? 3) What is the being of popularity phenomenon of mixed-member electoral systems? In the recent years the most popular electoral systems are: proportional representation with open lists and majority rules in single member-districts.

Keywords


elections; electoral systems; proportional electoral system; majority system; mixed-member electoral systems; politics of electoral reforms; political parties; parliaments

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Carstairs, A. 1980. A Short History of Electoral Systems in Western Europe, London–New York.

Colabrese, S. 2000. Multimember District Congressional Elections, „Legislative Studies Quarterly”, nr 25.

Colomer, J. 2004. The Americas: General Overview [w:] Handbook of Electoral System Choice, J. Colomer, M.B. Grofman (red.), New York.

Colomer, J. 2004. Western Europe: General Overview [w:] Handbook of Electoral System Choice, J. Colomer, M.B. Grofman (red.), New York.

Colomer, J.M. 2004, The Strategy and History of Electoral System Choice [w:] Handbook of Electoral System Choice, J. Colomer, M.B. Grofman (red.), New York.

Elklit, J. 2002. The Politics of Electoral System Development and Change: The Danish Case [w:] The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in the Nordic Countries, B. Grofman, A. Lijphart (red.), New York.

Farell, D. 1997. Comparing Electoral Systems, Basingstoke–New York.

Farrell, D., Gallagher, M., Submission to the Independent Commission on the Voting System, http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk (dostęp: 10.02.2008).

Grofman, B., Lijphart, A. 2002. The Evolution of Electoral and Party Systems in the Nordic Countries, London.

Grotius, H., 1624, The Juri Belli ac Pacis, Haga.

Hicken, A. 2004. Asia and Pacific: General Overview [w:] Handbook of Electoral System Choice, J. Colomer, M.B. Grofman (red.), New York.

Kleppner, P., Burnham, W.D. 1981. The Evolution of American Electoral Systems: (Contributions in American History), Greenwood Press.

Martis, K. 1982. The Historical Atlas of United States Congressional Districts, 1789–1983, New York.

Mc Gann, A., Koetzle, W., Grofman, B. 2002. How an Ideologically Concentrated Minority Can Trump a Dispersed Majority: Nonmedian Voter Results for Plurality, Run-off, and Sequential Elimination Elections, „American Journal of Political Science”, nr 46 (1).

Nohlen, D. 2004. Prawo wyborcze i system partyjny. O teorii systemów wyborczych, Warszawa.

Ortega y Gasset, J. 2006. Bunt mas, Warszawa.

Piotrowicz, L. 1934. Dzieje rzymskie, cz. 1 [w:] Wielka historia powszechna, J. Dąbrowski, O. Halecki, M. Kukiel, S. Lam, (red.), t. 3, Warszawa.

Reed, S.R. 2003. Japanese Electoral Politics: Creating a New Party System, Routledge.

Rousseau, J.J. 2010. Umowa społeczna, Warszawa.

Shugart, M.S., Wattenberg, M.P., 2001. Conclusion: Are Mixed-Member Systems the Best of Both Worlds? [w:] Mixed-Member Electoral Systems. The Best of Both Worlds?, M.S. Shugart, M.P. Wattenberg (red.), Oxford.

Sokół, W. 2007. Geneza i ewolucja systemów wyborczych w państwach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej, Lublin.

Wright, J.F.H. 1986. Australian Experience with Majority – Preferential and Quota-Preferential Systems’, Electoral Laws and Their Political Consequences, New York.

Zdaniuk, B. 2005. Wybory parlamentarne we Francji 1789–1914. Problem reprezentatywności wyboru, Warszawa.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/k.2013.20.2.115
Date of publication: 2013-11-18 00:00:00
Date of submission: 2015-07-18 09:14:03


Statistics


Total abstract view - 766
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 258

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Wojciech Sokół

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.