Psychometric Properties of the Polish Social Empathy Questionnaire: Reliability, Validity, and Gender and Age Equivalence

Agnieszka Lasota

Abstract


Introduction: Empathy is a dynamic developmental process, requiring flexible behaviour of the empathiser in the social context. Therefore, it is crucial to know and understand the social function of empathy and its dynamic nature in interpersonal relationships.
Research Aim: The aim of the study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the Polish version of the Social Empathy Questionnaire.
Method: This instrument measures empathy levels in interpersonal relationships among adults. It is based on four dimensions of empathy, i.e. taking the perspective of others, emotional sensitivity and concern for others, interpersonal flexibility and openness to compromise, and altruism – deferring decisions for the benefit of others. It assesses levels of empathy in a social context, especially in situations of conflict. Two studies were conducted with 1,149 adults aged 18 to 74 years.
Results: Study 1 confirmed the four-factor structure of the tool and assessed the reliability of the empathy dimensions. It also evaluated the measurement equivalence of the models for female and male gender and for age. Study 2 aimed to assess the convergent and discriminant validity.
Conclusion: The results confirmed that the 33-item Polish version of the Social Empathy Questionnaire has good psychometric properties. It can be used in research and as a diagnostic tool to help diagnose people with difficulties in establishing social relationships or at risk of social maladjustment. It may also be useful in business, especially in the recruitment of employees for positions that require effective interpersonal communication that impacts work efficiency.


Keywords


social empathy, empathy questionnaire, psychometric properties, reliability, validity

Full Text:

PDF

References


Anderson, C., Keltner, D. (2002). The role of empathy in the formation and maintenance of social bonds. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25(1), 21–22. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X02230010

Aranowska, E., Rytel, J. (2012). Struktura czynnikowa kwestionariusza agresji Bussa i Perry’ego (BPQA) w populacji polskiej. Studia Psychologica, 12(2), 135–151.

Auné, S., Facundo, A., Attorresi, H. (2017). Psychometric properties of a test for assessing empathic behavior. Revista Iberoamericana de Diagnósticoe Avaliação Psicológica, 3, 47–56. https://doi.org/10.21865/RIDEP45.3.04

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S. (2004). The empathy quotient: an investigation of adults with Asperger syndrome or high functioning autism, and normal sex differences. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 34, 163–175. https://doi.org/10.1023/b:jadd.0000022607.19833.00

Brett, J.D., Becerra, R., Maybery, M.T., Preece, D.A. (2023). The psychometric assessment of empathy: Development and validation of the Perth Empathy Scale. Assessment, 30, 1140–1156.

Buss, A.H., Perry, M. (1992). The aggression questionnaire. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(3), 452–459.

https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.452

Byrne, B.M. (2016). Structural Equation Modeling with AMOS: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming. Routledge.

Chen, F.F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(3), 464–504. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705510701301834

Davis, M. (1980). A multidimensional approach to individual differences in empathy. JSAS Catalog of Selected Documents in Psychology, 10, 1–19.

Davis, M.H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 113.

Davis, M.H. (1994). Empathy: A social Psychological Approach. Brown & Benchmark.

Decety, J., Jackson, P.L. (2004). The functional architecture of human empathy. Behavioral and Cognitive Neuroscience Reviews, 3, 71–100.

Falcone, E.M., de O., Ferreira, M.C., Luz, R.C.M. da, Fernandes, C.S., Faria, C. de A., D’Augustin, J.F., Sardinha, A., Pinho, V.D. de. (2008). Inventário De Empatia (I.E.): Desenvolvimento E Validação De Uma Medida Brasileira. Avaliação Psicológica, 7(3), 321–334.

Falcone, E.M. de O., Pinho, V.D. de, Ferreira, M.C., Fernandes, C. dos S., D’Augustin, J.F., Krieger, S., Plácido, M.G., Vianna, K. de O., Electo, L. da C.T., Pinheiro, L.C. (2013). Validade convergente do Inventário de Empatia (IE). Psico-USF, 18, 203–209.

https://doi.org/10.1590/S1413-82712013000200004

Halpern, J. (2007). Empathy and patient-physician conflicts. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 22(5), 696–700.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-006-0102-3

Hollar, D.W. (2017). Psychometrics and assessment of an empathy distance gradient. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 35(4), 377–390.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0734282915623882

Hong, H., Han, A. (2020). A systematic review on empathy measurement tools for care professionals. Educational Gerontology, 46, 72–83.

Ickes, W.J., Marangoni, C., Garcia, S. (1997). Studying empathic accuracy in a clinically relevant context. In Empathic Accuracy (pp. 282–310). The Guilford Press.

Jankowiak-Siuda, K., Kantor-Martynuska, J., Siwy-Hudowska, A., Śmieja, M., Dobrołowicz-Konkol, M., Zaraś-Wieczorek, I., Siedler, A. (2017). Psychometric properties of the Polish adaptation of short form of the Empathy Quotient (EQ-Short). Psychiatria Polska, 51(4), 719–734.

https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/64270

Kaźmierczak, M., Plopa, M., Retowski, S. (2007). Skala Wrażliwości Empatycznej. Przegląd Psychologiczny, 50, 1, 9–24.

Klimecki, O. (2019). The role of empathy and compassion in conflict resolution. Emotion Review, 11(4), 175407391983860.

https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073919838609

Kupetz, M. (2014). Empathy displays as interactional achievements – multimodal and sequential aspects. Journal of Pragmatics, 61, 4–34.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2013.11.006

Larionow, P., Preece, D.A. (2023). The Perth Empathy Scale: Psychometric properties of the Polish Version and its mental health correlates. European Journal of Investigation in Health, Psychology and Education, 13, 2615-2629. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe13110182

Lima, F.F.d., Osório, F.d.L. (2021). Empathy: Assessment Instruments and psychometric quality – a systematic literature review with a meta-analysis of the past ten years. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 781346.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.781346

Main, A. (2022). Comment: Empathy as a flexible and fundamentally interpersonal phenomenon: Comment on “why we should reject the restrictive isomorphic matching definition of empathy”. Emotion Review, 14(3), 182–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221107030

Main, A., Walle, E.A., Kho, C., Halpern, J. (2017). The interpersonal functions of empathy: A relational perspective. Emotion Review, 9(4), 358–366. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073916669440

Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58(4), 525–543.

https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02294825

Murphy, B.A., Algoe, S.B. (2022). Authors reply: Empathy and creativity: Dangers of the methodological tail wagging the conceptual dog. Emotion Review, 14(3), 189–193. https://doi.org/10.1177/17540739221108220

Reniers, R.L.E.P., Corcoran, R., Drake, R., Shryane, N.M., Völlm, B.A. (2011). The QCAE: A Questionnaire of Cognitive and Affective Empathy. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1), 84–95.

https://doi.org/10.1080/00223891.2010.528484

Richardson, D., Brown, L., Lago, T. (2008). The relationship between perspective-taking and nonaggressive responding in the face of an attack. Journal of Personality, 66, 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00011

Sinclair, S., Beamer, K., Hack, T.F., McClement, S., Raffin Bouchal, S., Chochinov, H.M., Hagen, N.A. (2017). Sympathy, empathy, and compassion: A grounded theory study of palliative care patients’ understandings, experiences, and preferences. Palliative Medicine, 31(5), 437–447.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0269216316663499

Stocks, E.L., Lishner, D.A. (2018). Empathy and altruism. In Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Psychology.

https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190236557.013.272

van Hazebroek, B.C.M., Olthof, T., Goossens, F.A. (2017). Predicting aggression in adolescence: The interrelation between (a lack of) empathy and social goals. Aggressive Behavior, 43(2), 204–214.

https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21675

Zaki, J., Bolger, N., Ochsner, K. (2008). It takes two: The interpersonal nature of empathic accuracy. Psychological Science, 19(4), 399–404.

https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02099.x




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2024.43.4.189-207
Date of publication: 2025-01-22 11:01:23
Date of submission: 2024-07-16 03:01:46


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators





Copyright (c) 2025

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.