Das Prinzip der Knappheit im amerikanischen Gefängnisslang
Abstract
Der Band enthält die Abstracts ausschließlich in englischer Sprache.
Schlagworte
Volltext:
PDF (English)Literaturhinweise
https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/AMR51/035/1998/en/
https://www.hrw.org/legacy/advocacy/prisons/u-s.htm
https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=WIC&division=5.&title=∂=1.&chapter=2.&article=1
Cambell, G. 1868. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Harper & Brothers.
Cowley, S. J. 2004. Contextualizing bodies: Human infants and distributed cognition. Language Sciences, 26, 565-591.
Davison, D. 1981. What metaphors mean. In: M Johnson (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 200-220.
Dumas, B. K., Lighter, J. 1978. Is slang a word for linguists?. American Speech, 53(1), 5-17.
Gibbs, R. W. 1992. Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review, 99(3), 572-577.
Gibbs, R. W. (ed.). 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge/New York: CUP.
Green, J. 2010. Green’s Dictionary of Slang. London: Chambers Harrap Publishers.
Halliday, M. A. K. 1976. Anti-Languages. American Anthropologist, 78(3), 570-584.
Halliwell, S. (transl.). 1995. Aristotle Poetics. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.
Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.
Irwin, J., Cressey, D. R. 1962. Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10(2), 142-155.
Johnson, M. 1981. Introduction: Metaphor in the philosophical tradition. In: M. Johnson (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3-47.
Kecskés, I. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 385-406.
Kecskés, I. 2015. Language, culture, and context. In: F. Sharifian (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. London/New York: Routledge, 113-129.
Kövecses, Z. 2006. Language, Mind, and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Kövecses, Z. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford/New York: OUP.
Kravchenko, A. V. 2007. Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences, 29, 650-671.
Kroskrity, P. V. 2001. Identity. In: A. Duranti (ed.), Key Terms in Language and Culture. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 106-109.
Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195-208.
Love, N. 2007. Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, 29, 690-709.
Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A. 1946. The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace.
Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London/Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Risager, K. 2014. The language-culture nexus in transnational perspective. In: F. Sharifian (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. London/New York: Routledge, 87-99.
Salzmann, Z. 2007. Language, Culture, and Society. Boulder: Westview Press.
Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E. 1994. Intercultural Communication. A Reader. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Sapir, E. 1929. The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5, 207-214.
Van Dijk, T. A. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: CUP.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2017.41.2.12
Date of publication: 2018-01-02 15:01:02
Date of submission: 2017-04-22 10:30:10
Statistiken
Indikatoren
Refbacks
- Im Moment gibt es keine Refbacks
Copyright (c) 2018 Alicja Dziedzic-Rawska
Dieses Werk steht unter der Lizenz Creative Commons Namensnennung 4.0 International.