Les frontières de la notion „État-Providence” dans la construction des identités politiques dans la presse britannique

Malgorzata Paprota

Résumé


Le numéro contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.


Mots-clés


welfare state; concept boundaries; discourse-historical approach; British press

Texte intégral :

PDF (English)

Références


Primary sources

AmeliaGentleman (2015, 18 March). Re: Labour vows to reduce reliance on food banks if it comes to power. [Reader comment]. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/society/2015/mar/17/labour-vows-to-reduce-reliance-on-food-banks-if-it-comes-to-power#comment-49082281

Bowers, S. (2009, 28 September). Icelandic crisis: Rocky road ahead for the small island in big trouble. The Guardian.

Chang, H.-J. (2010, 4 October). The right direction: While some say Red Ed is lurching left, the labels left and right have little meaning in today's world. The Guardian.

Gentleman, A. (2015, 17 March), Labour vows to reduce reliance on food banks if it comes to power. The Guardian.

Daley, J. (2010, 4 April). Blair’s project was always destined to fail. The Sunday Telegraph.

Daily Mirror (2010, 18 August). Tories offer undiluted Thatcherism. First 100 days of catastrophe. The Daily Mirror.

McKay, P. (2013, 1 April). The Peter McKay column. The Daily Mail.

Oborne, P. (2009, 2 May). Where’s Maggie when we need her? The Daily Mail.

Oborne, P. (2013, 7 April). Osborne can't claim credit for IDS's virtuous reforms. The Sunday Telegraph.

Routledge, P. (2013, 2 January). Slasher Smith and the Tory benefits lie. The Daily Mirror.

Secondary sources

Baumberg, B., Bell, K., Gaffney, D., Deacon, R., Hood, C., and Sage, D. (2012): Benefits Stigma in Britain. London: Turn2Us, Elizabeth Finn Care and University of Kent. Retrieved from https://www.turn2us.org.uk/About-Us/Research-and-Insights/Benefits-Stigma-in-Britain

Brewer, M. (2007). Welfare reform in the UK: 1997 – 2007. IFS Working Paper (W07/20). London: Institute for Fiscal Studies. doi: 10.1920/wp.ifs.2007.0720

Bryson, V., & Fisher, P. (2011). Findings and conclusions. In: Bryson, V., and Fisher, P. (eds), Redefining Social Justice. New Labour Rhetoric and Reality, pp. 1-16. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.

Coxall, W. N., Robins, L., & Leach, R. (2003). Contemporary British Politics (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Daguerre, A., & Etherington, D. (2014). Welfare Reform in the UK under the Conservative-led Coalition Government: Ruptures and Continuities (Working Paper). Economic Social and Research Council and Middlesex University. Retrieved from http://workfare.org.uk/pages/resources

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. London and New York: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical Discourse Analysis: The Critical Study of Language (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.

Fairclough, N., & Wodak, R. (1997). Critical Discourse Analysis, in van Dijk, T.A. (ed.), Discourse as Social Interaction, pp. 258-84. London: Sage.

Garland, D. (2015). The Welfare State. A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Jeffries, L. (2010). Critical Stylistics. The Power of English. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

King, D., & Ross, F. (2010). Critics and beyond. In Castles, F.G., Leibfried, S., Lewis, J., Obinger, H., and Pierson, C. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State, pp. 45-57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Koller, V. (2004). Metaphor and Gender in Business Media Discourse: A Critical Cognitive Study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Krzyżanowski, M. (2009). The discursive construction of Europe and values in the coverage of the Polish 1981 ‘State of War’ in the European Press. In Triandafyllidou, A., Wodak, R., and Krzyżanowski, M. (eds.), The European Public Sphere and the Media. Europe in Crisis, pp. 174-197. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Krzyżanowski, M. (2010). The Discursive Construction of European Identities. A Multi-Level Approach to Discourse and Identity in the Transforming European Union. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

Krzyżanowski, M. (2016). Recontextualisation of neoliberalism and the increasingly conceptual nature of discourse: Challenges for critical discourse studies. Discourse & Society 27(3), pp. 308-321.

Meyer, M. (2001). Between theory, method, and politics: positioning of the approaches to CDA. In Wodak, R., and

Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 14-31. London: Sage.

Paprota, M. (2013). Dis-articulating the welfare state. Denotation of welfare and welfare state in Conservative British Press. In: Bell, G. J., Nemčokova, K., and Wójcik, B. (eds.), From Theory to Practice 2012. Zlín Proceedings in Humanities, pp. 83-94. Zlin: Tomas Bata University in Zlin.

Paprota, M. (2015). The Chantelles of Benefits Britain: Collective representations of the clients of the welfare state in conservative British press (2008-2012). Lublin Studies in Modern Languages and Literature 39(2), pp. 179-191.

Reisigl, M., & Wodak, R. (2016). The discourse-historical approach (DHA). In Wodak, R., and Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Studies, pp. 23-61. 3rd edition. London: Sage.

Robb, K.A., Simon, A.E., Miles, A., & Wardle, J. (2014). Public perceptions of cancer: a qualitative study of the balance of positive and negative beliefs. BMJ Open 2014(4). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005434

Skeggs, B. (2004). Class, Self, Culture. London: Routledge.

Wodak, R. (2001). The Discourse-Historical Approach. In Wodak, R., and Meyer, M. (eds.), Methods of Critical Discourse Analysis, pp. 63-94. London: Sage.

Taylor-Gooby, P. (2016). The divisive welfare state. Social Policy & Administration 50(6), pp. 712-733. doi 10.1111/spol.12257

Timmins, N. (2001). The Five Giants: A Biography of the Welfare State. London: HarperCollins.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2018.42.2.46-65
Date of publication: 2018-07-11 11:33:34
Date of submission: 2018-04-07 15:27:16


Statistiques


Visibilité des résumés - 1007
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (English) - 539

Indicateurs



Renvois

  • Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.


Droit d'auteur (c) 2018, Malgorzata Paprota

Licence Creative Commons
Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.