Evolution and Current State of the American Model of Administrative Procedure: Towards Reform and Conceptual Understanding
Abstract
Administrative procedure in the United States of America is an integral part of administrative law. It is universal in its nature as it plays the role of an effective tool to regulate the conduct and activities of officials of state authorities, to combat corruption, and to protect the rights and legitimate interests of citizens. The relevant agencies issue rules and regulations that have the force of law. Currently, progressive governance largely depends on decisions of the state policy made in the course of government rule-making, and therefore certain aspects of the modern model of administrative procedure in the US should be revised with a view to further reform. The objective of the article is to conduct independent research on the formation and current condition of the American model of administrative procedure. A set of general scientific and special methods was used to achieve this objective. The leading method in the process of research was the dialectical method of cognition of phenomena and processes, which made it possible to determine the condition, areas and prospects for the development of scientific research and legislative developments in legal regulation and approbation of the American model of administrative procedure. The conclusion drawn by the authors made it possible to form a conceptual understanding of the American model of administrative procedure.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
LITERATURE
Beermann J.M., Administrative Law, Alphen aan den Rijn 2010.
Berry C.R., Gersen J.E., Agency Design and Political Control, “Yale Law Journal” 2017, vol. 126(4).
Bertelli A.M., Busuioc M., Reputation-Sourced Authority and the Prospect of Unchecked Bureaucratic Power, “Public Administration Review” 2021, vol. 81(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13281.
Chudyk N., Vivchar O., Strategy of Strengthening the Economic Security of Enterprises of Network Structures: Pragmatics and Key Vectors of Development, “Law, Policy and Security” 2023, vol. 1(1).
DeLeo J.D., Administrative Law, Boston 2008.
DeMuth С., Can the Administrative State Be Tamed?, “Journal of Legal Analysis” 2016, vol. 8(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/law003.
Epstein R.A., The Role of Guidances in Modern Administrative Procedure: The Case for “De Novo” Review, “Journal of Legal Analysis” 2015, vol. 8(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jla/lav012.
Johnstone I., Legislation and Adjudication in the UN Security Council: Bringing Down the Deliberative Deficit, “American Journal of International Law” 2008, vol. 102(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/30034539.
Karamanukyan D.T., The Legal Nature of Administrative Agencies of the USA, “Bulletin of the Omsk Law Academy” 2016, no. 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.19073/2306-1340-2016-1-85-90. [in Russian]
Kessler J., Sabel C., The Uncertain Future of Administrative Law, “Daedalus” 2021, vol. 150(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01867.
Kisil Z., On the Issue of Integration of Civil Society Institutions in Preventing Corruption in Ukraine: Administrative and Legal Dimension, “Social and Legal Studios” 2022, vol. 5(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-2-31-37.
Kochan D.J., The Commenting Power: Agency Accountability through Public Participation, “Oklahoma Law Review” 2018, vol. 70(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3006157.
Lu W., Comparative Analysis of the Establishment of Chinese and American Think Tanks, “Foreign Affairs” 2021, vol. 31(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.31(5).2021.44-51.
Markova О., Comparative Legal Analysis Types of Administrative Procedure, “Legal Bulletin” 2020, vol. 3(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.32837/yuv.v0i3.1902.
Noll R.G., McCcubbins M.D., Weingas B.R., Administrative Procedures as Instruments of Political Control, “Journal of Law Economics and Organization” 1987, vol. 3(2).
Rosenbloom D.H., Administrative Law for Public Managers, London 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429494239.
Serneda O., Tsummer A., Prerequisites for the 1994 Budapest Memorandum in the Context of Ukrainian-American Relations, “Foreign Affairs” 2022, vol. 32(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.46493/2663-2675.32(5).2022.24-31.
Yackee S.W., The Politics of Rulemaking in the United States, “Annual Review of Political Science” 2019, vol. 22(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-050817-092302.
Yackee S.W., The “Science” of Policy Development during Administrative Rulemaking, “Policy Studies Journal” 2021, vol. 49(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12350.
Yesimov S., Borovikova V., Administrative and Legal Implementation of the Rights of Business Entities, “Social and Legal Studios” 2022, vol. 5(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2022-5-3-16-22.
Ziekow J., Administrative Procedures and Processes, [in:] Public Administration in Germany: Governance and Public Management, eds. S. Kuhlmann, I. Proeller, D. Schimanke, J. Ziekow, Cham 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53697-8_11.
ONLINE SOURCES
Ahn S.C., Legitimacy, Flexibility and Administrative Law, 2021, https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1093&context=etd (access: 10.2.2024).
Balla S., Bull R., Dooling B., Hammond E., Herz M., Livermore M., Noveck B.S., Mass, Computer-Generated, and Fraudulent Comments, 1.6.2021, https://cutt.ly/IERZqU0 (access: 14.9.2023).
Barnes J., Towards a Third Generation of Administrative Procedures, 29–30.4.2016, https://law.yale.edu/sites/default/files/area/conference/compadmin/compadmin16_barnes_towards.pdf (access: 10.2.2024).
Coglianese C., Administrative Law: The U.S. and Beyond, 2016, https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=2657&context=faculty_scholarship (access: 15.9.2023).
Course Hero, The New Social Regulation and the Transformation of Administrative Law, 4.2.2008, https://www.coursehero.com/file/p3p83aa/Transmission-Belt-Theory-of-Administrative-Containment-The-regulatory-agency-is (access: 18.9.2023).
Duncan D.G., Levey B.R., DOJ Issues “Rich Menu of Options” for Congress to Revise the Administrative Procedure Act, 18.8.2020, https://www.natlawreview.com/article/doj-issues-rich-menu-options-congress-to-revise-administrative-procedure-act (access: 11.9.2023).
Giacinto C. della, Administrative Procedure in Europe, 31.10.2022, https://www.theregreview.org/2022/10/31/della-cananea-administrative-procedure-in-europe (access: 7.9.2023).
Huth V., Celebrating the 75th Anniversary of the Administrative Procedure Act, 11.6.2021, https://www.gsa.gov/blog/2021/06/11/celebrating-the-75th-anniversary-of-the-administrative-procedure-act (access: 10.2.2024).
Office of Public Affairs, Justice Department Releases Report on Modernizing the Administrative Procedure Act, 11.8.2020, https://www.justice.gov/opa/pr/justice-department-releases-report-modernizing-administrative-procedure-act (access: 10.2.2024).
Sant’Ambrogio M., Staszewski G., Public Engagement with Agency Rulemaking, 19.11.2018, https://www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/Public%20Engagement%20in%20Rulemaking%20Final%20Report.pdf (access: 10.2.2024).
Walker C.J., A Reform Agenda for Administrative Adjudication, 2021, https://www.cato.org/regulation/spring-2021/reform-agenda-administrative-adjudication (access: 11.9.2023).
LEGAL ACTS
Administrative Procedure Act, 1946.
Constitution of the United States, 1787.
E-Government Act, 2002.
Model State Administrative Procedure Act, 2009.
New York State Administrative Procedure Act, 1975.
United States Code, 2019.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.1.123-141
Date of publication: 2024-03-28 13:58:00
Date of submission: 2022-08-10 11:20:57
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Olena O. Markova, Viktoria O. Pankratova, Kateryna Naumenko, Lesia L. Honcharenko
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.