Hide
Show all
Email this article Does the Plenary Session of the Italian State Council Become a Common Law Judge?
Abstract
The article embraces the question of competence of the Italian Council of State (Consiglio di Stato) in the light of orders referred to in Article 99 of the Italian Administrative Procedure Code. The Council of State is a consultative legal-administrative organ, which guarantees the legality of the public administration. It is considered a bastion of the rule of law. Therefore, the author asks questions regarding the transformation of the system of justice in administrative cases towards common law. Conclusion: the administrative jurisdiction applies its competences for the benefit and protection of a citizen. Based on Article 99 of the Administrative Procedure Code, the mechanism consisting in applying the precedential practice imposes the forms of institutional cooperation in the administrative jurisdiction system. The author claims that a binding precedent is fully consistent with the principle of the rule of law and legality.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Achour c. Francia, March 29, 2006.
Bobbio N., Teoria generale del diritto, Torino 1993.
Cantoni c. Francia, November 15, 1996.
Cardozo B.N., Selected Writings of Benjamin Cardozo (Il giudice e il diritto), New York, 1947 (trad. it. Firenze, La Nuova Italia 1961).
Cassese S., I Tribunali di Babele (I giudici alla ricerca di un nuovo ordine globale), Roma 2009.
Cassese S., Problemi delle ideologie dei giudici, [in:] Studi in memoria di Carlo Esposito, Padova 1972.
Court of Justice of the European Union, October 6, 1982, causa C-283/81, Cilfit srl e Lanificio di Gavardo spa c. Ministero della Sanità, in Racc., 1982, 3415.
Court of Justice of the European Union, September 15, 2005, causa C-495/03, Intermodal Transports BV c. Staatssecretaris van Financiën, Racc., 2005, I-8151.
David R., I grandi sistemi giuridici contemporanei (a cura di Sacco), Padova 1973.
EUCJ (Grand Chamber), April 5, 2016, C-689/13.
Ferrari V., L’equivoco del giudice legislatore, 2017.
Guastini R., Il giudice e la legge, Torino 1995.
Kokkinakis c. Grecia, May 25, 1993.
Kopp c. Svizzera, March 25, 1998.
Kruslin c. Francia, April 24, 1990.
Lamond G., Precedent and analogy in legal reasoning, [in:] Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, 2006, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2006/entries/legal-reas-prec [access: 10.02.2018].
Nigro M., Giustizia amministrativa, Bologna 1983.
Olivecrona K., Il diritto come fatto, Milano 1967.
Olivecrona K., Law as Fact, London 1939.
Patroni Griffi F., La sentenza amministrativa, [in:] Trattato di diritto amministrativo, a cura di S. Cassese, tomo V, Milano 2003.
Pesce G., L’Adunanza plenaria del Consiglio di Stato e il vincolo del precedente, Napoli 2012.
Pessino c. Francia, October 10, 2006.
Pound R., An Introduction to the Philosophy of Law, New Haven 1922.
Pound R., The deviation of American Law from English Law, “Law Quarterly Review” 1952, Vol. 67.
Proto Pisani A., Tre note sui «precedenti» nella evoluzione della giurisprudenza della Corte costituzionale, nella giurisprudenza di una Corte di cassazione necessariamente ristrutturata e nella interpretazione delle norme processuali, “Il Foro italiano” 2017, n. 9.
Rordorf R., Nomofilachia e precedente giudiziario: Il precedente nella giurisprudenza, “Il Foro italiano” 2017, n. 1.
Ross A., On Law and Justice (Diritto e giustizia), Torino 1965.
Sunday Times c. Regno Unito, decision April 29, 1979.
Tarello G., Storia della cultura giuridica moderna, Bologna 1976.
Valenzuela Contreras c. Spagna, July 30, 1999.
Waldron J., Judges as Moral Reasoners, “International Journal of Constitutional Law” 2009, Vol. 7(2).
Waldron J., Stare decisis and the Rule of Law: A Layered Approach, [in:] Public Law & Legal theory research paper sciences, NYU School of Law, October 2011.
www.giustizia-amministrativa.it [access: 10.02.2018].
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2018.27.1.167
Date of publication: 2018-05-02 07:55:29
Date of submission: 2018-02-12 22:14:33
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2018
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.