The Evidence Given by Slaves in the Trials of crimen maiestatis
Abstract
According to the rule being in force in Republican Rome, the slave testimony could not be used to the detriment of their owners, in particular in cases punishable by death (in caput domini), and the slaves could not bring charges against the owners. The few crimes in which exceptions were permitted was the crime of majesty. This article presents the most important views of Roman authors on the credibility of testimony given under torture and also explains the reasons for using torture in interrogating slaves. During the Principate period, the ban on interrogating slaves against their owners in maiestas cases was circumvented and then was abolished by imperial constitutions. During the Dominate period, the crime of lese-majesty was the only one in which a slave was allowed to accuse his master.
Keywords
References
Bauman R.A., The Crimen Maiestatis in the Roman Republic and Augustan Principate, Johannesburg 1970.
Brunt R.A., Evidence given under Torture in the Principate, “ZSS” 1980, vol. 97(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.7767/zrgra.1980.97.1.256.
Chmiel A., Immediacy Principle in Roman Criminal Procedure, „Krytyka Prawa” 2016, vol. 8(2).
Chmiel A., Ochrona bezpieczeństwa właścicieli niewolników w świetle S.C. Silanianum – zagadnienia dowodowe, [in:] Ochrona bezpieczeństwa i porządku publicznego w prawie rzymskim, eds. K. Amielańczyk, A. Dębiński, D. Słapek, Lublin 2010.
Chmiel A., Zasada kontradyktoryjności w rzymskim procesie karnym, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego. Seria Prawnicza. Prawo” 2018, no. 101, DOI: https://doi.org/10.15584/znurprawo.2018.22.3.
Dyjakowska, Crimen laesae maiestatis. Studium nad wpływami prawa rzymskiego w dawnej Polsce, Lublin 2010.
Dyjakowska, Ochrona bezpieczeństwa i porządku publicznego a rzymskie ustawy o obrazie majestatu, [in:] Ochrona bezpieczeństwa i porządku publicznego w prawie rzymskim, eds. K. Amielańczyk, A. Dębiński, D. Słapek, Lublin 2010.
Litewski W., Rzymski proces karny, Kraków 2003.
Loska E, Kilka uwag na temat zeznań niewolników w procesie karnym, „Zeszyty Naukowe KUL” 2017, no. 3.
MacMullen R., Enemies of the Roman Order: Treason, Unrest, and Alienation in the Empire, Cambridge 1966.
Mommsen Th., Römisches Strafrecht, Graz 1955.
Pesch A., De perduellione, crimine maiestatis et memoria damnata, Aachen 1995.
Robinson O., Slaves and the Criminal Law, “ZSS” 1981, vol. 98(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.7767/zrgra.1981.98.1.213.
Rogers R.S., Criminal Trials and Criminal Legislation under Tiberius, Middletown 1935.
Russo-Ruggeri C., Quaestiones ex libero homine. La tortura degli uomini liberi nella repressione criminale romana dell’eta repubblicana e del I secolo dell’imperio, Milano 2002.
Schisas P.M., Offences Against the State in Roman Law and the Courts Which Were Competent to Take Cognisance of Them, London 1926.
Schumacher L., Servus index: Sklavenverhör und Sklavenanzeige im republikanischen und kaiserzeitlichen Rom, Wiesbaden 1982.
Seibt W., Die Majestätsprozesse vor dem Senatsgericht unter Tiberius, Wien 1969.
Sitek B., „Questionem” intellegere debemus tormenta et corporis dolorem ad eruendam veritatem, [in:] Crimina et mores. Prawo karne i obyczaje w starożytnym Rzymie, ed. M. Kuryłowicz, Lublin 2001.
Solidoro Maruotti L., La disciplina del crimen maiestatis tra tardo antico e medioevo, [in:] Diritto e giustizia nel processo. Prospettive storiche constituzionali e comparatistiche, eds. C. Cascione, C. Masi Doria, Napoli 2002.
Triggiano A., Evidence Given under Torture in Aristotle and Cicero, “Teoria e Storia del Diritto Privato” 2009, no. 2.
Vincenti U., „Duo genera sunt testium”. Contributo allo studio della prova testimoniale nel processo romano, Padova 1989.
Zumpt A.W., Das Criminalrecht der römischen Republik, vol. 2, part 1, Aalen 1993.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.2.125-138
Date of publication: 2021-06-30 23:18:49
Date of submission: 2020-02-02 15:31:34
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2021 Marzena Dyjakowska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.