A Compassionate State of Mind: How Michigan Personal Injury Lawyers Think about Non-Monetary Goals and Interests?

Maria Cudowska

Abstract


The article is a result of a qualitative empirical study designed to reveal whether personal injury lawyers in the State of Michigan implement compassionate counseling practices. The study contributes to a well-established body of research pertinent to the development of soft skills in legal practice, whilst also attempting to proliferate and highlight the benefits of out-of-court settlements. The research was designed to study the nature of compassionate counseling practices and its effect on mediated settlements. Consequently, the research analyzed how lawyers evaluate intangible and non-monetary interests of clients and whether those play a role on the dispute resolution continuum. The paper also elaborates on what lawyers do and do not do well in assessing intangible interests of clients. The study posits that if lawyers attend to those intangible interests, it is a form of compassionate practice. Therefore, the study has both theoretical and practical implications for lawyers and mediators. Last, the study suggests that alternative dispute resolution mechanisms, such as mediation, attribute to a speedier resolution of personal injury disputes.


Keywords


compassion; lawyers; alternative dispute resolution; personal injury; mediation

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Afrassiab Z., Why Mediation & Sorry Make Sense: Apology Statutes as Catalyst for Change in Medical Malpractice, “Journal of Dispute Resolution” 2019, no. 2.

Bloom P., Against Empathy: The Case for Rational Compassion, London 2016.

Cho J., Gifford K., The Anxious Lawyer: An 8-week Guide to a Joyful and Satisfying Law Practice through Mindfulness and Meditation, New York 2016.

Colby T.B., In Defense of Judicial Empathy, “Minnesota Law Review” 2012, vol. 96.

Delgado R., Stefancic J., Do Judges Cry? An Essay on Empathy and Fellow-Feeling, “Case Western Reserve Law Review” 2019, vol. 70(1).

Ebner N., The Human Touch in ODR: Trust, Empathy and Social Intuition in Online Negotiation and Mediation, [in:] Online Dispute Resolution: Theory and Practice, eds. D. Rainey, E. Katsh, M. Abdel Wahab, New York 2021.

Ellmann S., Lawyers and Clients, “UCLA Law Review” 1987, vol. 34.

Engel D.M., The Oven Bird’s Song: Insiders, Outsiders, and Personal Injuries in an American Community, “Law & Society Review” 1984, vol. 18(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3053447.

Feigenson R., Sympathy and Legal Judgment: A Psychological Analysis, “Tennessee Law Review” 1997, vol. 65(1).

Fissell B., Modern Critiques of Judicial Empathy: A Revised Intellectual History, “Michigan State Law Review” 2016, no. 3.

Gould E.J., The Empathy Debate: The Role of Empathy in Law, Mediation, and the New Professionalism, “Vermont Bar Journal” 2010, vol. 36(3).

Henderson L.N., Legality and Empathy, “Michigan Law Review” 1987, vol. 85(7), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1288933.

Herman G., How to Value Case for Negotiation and Settlement, “Montana Lawyer” 2005, vol. 31(3).

Hickling E.J., Blanchard E.B., Hickling M.T., The Psychological Impact of Litigation: Compensation Neurosis, Malingering, PTSD, Secondary Traumatization, and Other Lessons from MVAS, “DePaul Law Review” 2005, vol. 55(2).

Hoffmann P.T., Valuation of Cases for Settlement: Theory and Practice, “Journal of Dispute Resolution” 1999, no. 1.

Ingber S., Rethinking Intangible Injuries: A Focus on Remedy, “California Law Review” 1985, vol. 73(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3480343.

Kaheman D., Sibony O., Sunstein C.R., Noise: A Flaw in Human Judgement, New York 2021.

Lande J., How Advocates Can Manage Cases Better, and Get Good Results, with Planned Early Negotiation, “Alternatives to the High Cost of Litigation” 2011, vol. 29.

Linden A., American Tort Law: Shining Beacon?, “Pepperdine Law Review” 2011, vol. 38(2).

Margulies P., Re-Framing Empathy in Clinical Legal Education, “Clinical Law Review” 1999, vol. 5(2).

Mason J., How Might the Adversarial Imperative Be Effectively Tempered in Mediation, “Legal Ethics” 2012, vol. 15(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.5235/146072812801292755.

Nolan-Haley J.M., Lawyers, Clients, and Mediation, “Notre Dame Law Review” 1998, vol. 73.

O’Connell J., Born P., The Cost and Other Advantages of an Early Offers Reform for Personal Injury Claims against Business, Including for Product Liability, “Columbia Business Law Review” 2008, no. 2.

Robbennolt J.K., The Power of an Appropriate Apology, “Dispute Resolution Magazine” 2021, vol. 27(3).

Weston M.A., Checks on Participant Conduct in Compulsory ADR: Reconciling the Tension in the Need for Good-Faith Participation, Autonomy, and Confidentiality, “Indiana Law Journal” 2001, vol. 76(3).

Whyte D., Consolations: The Solace, Nourishment and Underlying Meaning of Everyday Words, Edinburgh 2019.

William Gibson K., Keeping Personal Injury Clients Happy, “Law Practice Management” 1998, vol. 24.

ONLINE SOURCES

Lerner H., Brown B., I’m Sorry: How To Apologize & Why It Matters, 6.3.2020, https://brenebrown.com/podcast/harriet-lerner-and-brene-im-sorry-how-to-apologize-why-it-matters (access: 5.3.2023).

Palazzolo J., We Won’t See You in Court: The Era of Tort Lawsuits Is Waning, 24.7.2017, https://www.wsj.com/articles/we-wont-see-you-in-court-the-era-of-tort-lawsuits-is-waning-1500930572 (access: 5.3.2023).

Stark S., Making the Most of Mediation: 10 Tips for Maximizing Results in the Process, https://www.starkmediator.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2013/10/2013_Article_Making_the_Most_of_Mediation.pdf (access: 5.3.2023).

The Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services (DIFS) Fraud Investigation Unit, 2021 Annual Report, https://www.michigan.gov/documents/difs/FIU_Annual_Report_2021_730217_7.pdf (access: 5.3.2023).

Weigel D., Tierney L., The Six Political States of Michigan, 9.8.2020, https://www.washingtonpost.com/graphics/2020/politics/michigan-political-geography (access: 5.3.2023).

LEGAL ACTS

A Mich. Civ. Jur. Automobiles and Motor Vehicles § 439.

Mich. Comp. Laws Ann. §§ 500.3101(1), 500.3135(1), 500.3135(5).

Michigan Rule of Professional Conduct.

CASE LAW

Lopez-Garcia v. United States, 207 F. Supp. 3d 753 (E.D. Mich. 2016).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.1.131-158
Date of publication: 2023-03-28 11:24:03
Date of submission: 2021-11-11 09:38:24


Statistics


Total abstract view - 766
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Maria Cudowska

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.