New authoritarianism in the XXI century: global trends and Russian case study

Alexandra Glukhova

Abstract


The purpose of the research was to analyze the phenomenon of the new authoritarianism in the XXIth century. New authoritarianism has a similarity with the classic authoritarian regimes of past eras, but also it has significant differences with them. The author captures the growth of authoritarian tendencies in the modern world and the resulting attempts of researchers to theoretically comprehend the phenomenon of authoritarianism, including its nature, factors favoring it, as well as the reasons for its stability and the risks of destabilization. The author cites the warnings of prominent intellectuals (R. Darendorf, s. Huntington) against underestimating the "stealing authoritarianism" as a modern form of a threat to democracy and freedom, as a restriction of the liberal order. The article identifies the factors contributing to the authoritarian trend, as well as the characteristic features of the new authoritarianism: anti-pluralism, restriction of free political activity, spreading xenophobia, etc. The Russian case study shows all the stages of new authoritarianism in the 1990s – 2000s, and its specific modern look (neocorporativism, statehood, the cultivation of traditional values and the image of the enemy represented by the West, etc.) Based on the theoretical model of the “critical moment” (Critical Yuncture), the vulnerable sides of the neo-authoritarian regime are shown, creating for it risks of destabilization.


Keywords


new authoritarianism; archaic; antipluralism; stability factors; destabilization risks; Russia; neocorporativism; state power; traditional values; ruling elite; "Critical moment" (Critical Yuncture)

References


Документы и правовые акты

Vystupleniye i diskussiya na Myunkhenskoy konferentsii po bezopasnosti. Ofitsial’nyy sayt Preziden- ta Rossiyskoy Federatsii, http://archive.kremlin.ru/appears/2007/02/10/1737_type63374type- 63376type63377type63381type82634_118097.shtml/

Federal’nyy zakon № 121 ot 20.06.2012 g. «O vnesenii izmeneniy v otdel’nyye zakonodatel’nyye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v chasti regulirovaniya deyatel’nosti nekommercheskikh organizatsiy, vy- polnyayushchikh funktsii inostrannogo agenta». http: //www/ consultant.ru/document/cons_ doc_LAV_132900/

Federal’nyy zakon ot 29.06.2013 N 136-FZ "O vnesenii izmeneniy v stat’yu 148 Ugolovnogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii i otdel’nyye zakonodatel’nyye akty Rossiyskoy Federatsii v tselyakh proti- vodeystviya oskorbleniyu religioznykh ubezhdeniy i chuvstv grazhdan" http://www.pravo.gov.ru, 30.06.2013,"Sobraniye zakonodatel’stva RF", 01.07.2013, N 26, st. 3209,"Rossiyskaya gazeta", N 141, 02.07.2013,"Parlamentskaya gazeta", N 24, 05-11.07.2013)..

Federal’nyy zakon ot 25.07.2002 N 114-FZ (red. ot 23.11.2015)"O protivodeystvii ekstremistskoy dey- atel’nosti" (Pervonachal’nyy tekst dokumenta opublikovan v izdaniyakh "Sobraniye zakonodate- l’stva RF", 29.07.2002, N 30, st. 3031,"Parlamentskaya gazeta", N 142-143, 30.07.2002,"Rossiy- skaya gazeta", N 138-139, 30.07.2002.

Federal’nyy zakon ot 26.09.1997 N 125-FZ(red. ot 05.02.2018) "O svobode sovesti i o religioznykh ob ”yedineniyakh" (Pervonachal’nyy tekst dokumenta opublikovan v izdaniyakh "Sobraniye zakonoda- tel’stva RF", 29.09.1997, N 39, st. 4465, "Rossiyskaya gazeta", N 190, 01.10.1997).

Монографии

Dahrendorf R.,Versuchungen der Unfreiheit (Die Intellektuellen in Zeiten der Prufung), Munchen 2006. Gdula M., Nowy autorytaryzm, Warszawa 2018.

Gorshkov M.K. i dr., Rossiyskoye obshchestvo i vyzovy vremeni. Kniga vtoraya (otv. red. Gorshkov M.K., Petukhov V.V), Moskva, 2015.

Khantington S., Tret’ya volna. Demokratizatsiya v kontse XX veka (per. s angl.), Moskva 2003.

Klyamkin I., Shevtsova L., VnesistemnyyrezhimBorisaII: nekotoryyeosobennostipoliticheskogorazvitiyapo stsovetskoyRossii, Moskva 1999.

Levitsky S., Way L., Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War, UK2010. Linz J.J., Totalitarian and Authoritarian Regimes, London2000.

Merkel W., Systemtransformation. Eine Einfuhrung in die Theorie und Empirie der Transformationsfor- schung, Wiesbaden2010.

O chem mechtayut rossiyane: ideal ili real’nost’, red. M.K. Gorshkov, R. Krumm, N.E. Tikhonova, Moskva

Ottaway M., Democracy Challenged: The Rise of Semi-Authoritarianism, Washington 2003. Shevtsova L., Politicheskiye zigzagi postkommunisticheskoy Rossii, Moskva 1997.

Shevtsova L., Rezhim Borisa El’tsina, Moskva 1999. Научныестатьи

Darendorf R., RazmyshleniyaorevolyutsiivEvrope (pis’monekoyemugospodinuvVarshave), „Put’. Mezhdu- narodnyy filosofskiy zhurnal” 1994, № 6.

Fisun A. A., K pereosmysleniyu postsovetskoy politiki: neopatrimonial’naya interpretatsiya, „Politiche- skaya kontseptologiya: zhurnal metadistsiplinarnykh issledovaniy” 2010, № 4.

Gerschewski J., Merkel W., Schmotz A., Stefes C., Tanneberg D., Warum uberleben Diktaturen, Politische Vierteljahresschrif, Sonderheft 47, 2012.

GlukhovaA.V., Neotraditsionalizmkakresurspoliticheskoymobilizatsii, [v:] Razumnarasput’ye: Obshchest vennoyesoznaniyemezhduproshlymibudushchim: Sborniknauchnykhstatey, red. Yu.A. Krasina (otv. red.), A.B. Vebera, A.A. Galkina, Moskva 2017.

Gudkov L., Inertsiya passivnoy adaptatsii, „Pro et contra”, yanvar’ – aprel’ 2011 g.

Gudkov L., Priroda putinizma, „Vestnik obshchestvennogo mneniya. Dannyye. Analiz. Diskussii”, Iyul’ – sentyabr’ 2009 g.

Inozemtsev V., Perspektivy razvitiya Rossii v novom politicheskom tsikle, „Polis. Politicheskiye issledo- vaniya” 2012, № 3.

Karozers T., Trezvyy vzglyad na demokratiyu, „Pro et contra” 2005, № 1 (28). Krastev I., Paradoksy novogo avtoritarizma, „Pro et contra” 2011, № 3-4 (52).

Mart’yanov V.S., Rossiyskiy politicheskiy poryadok v rentno-soslovnoy perspektive, „Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya” 2016, № 4.

Nisnevich Yu., Sovremennyy avtoritarizm i korruptsiya, „Mirovaya ekonomika i mezhdunarodnyye otno- sheniya” 2017, tom 61, № 1.

Pastukhov V., Tri prezidentskiye karty, „Novaya Gazeta” 31. 03. 2018.

Petukhov V.V., Krizisnaya real’nost’ i vozmozhnost’ politicheskoy transformatsii rossiyskogo obshchestva,

„Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya” 2016, № 5.

Putin V., Demokratiya i kachestvo gosudarstva, „Kommersant” 06.02.2012.

Ratlend P., Postsovetskiye elity Rossii, „Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya” 2016, № 3.

Rozov N.S., Teorii transformatsii politicheskikh rezhimov i priroda neopatrimonializma, „Polis. Politiche- skiye issledovaniya” 2015, № 6.

Yazhborovskaya I. S., Pol’sha 2015-2016 gg. Khronika neoavtoritarnogo revansha, „Polis. Politicheskiye issledovaniya” 2016, № 5.

Zubarevich N., Prostranstvo Rossii posle Kryma i na fone krizisa, „Pro et contra”, May – avgust 2014. Интернет-источники

Levada-Tsentr, Analiticheskiy tsentr Yuriya Levady, https://www.levada.ru

Pastukhov V., Zavtra dlya Rossii mozhet nastupit’ vot-vot, https: www.novayagazeta.ru/politics/61737. htm/

Rogov K., Treshchina, https://blog.newsru.com/article/06nov2018/treshina




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/we.2019.5.1.13-32
Date of publication: 2019-12-23 10:11:04
Date of submission: 2019-12-22 18:35:11


Statistics


Total abstract view - 2068
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Русский) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.