Security options for Eastern Europe

Olena Khylko

Abstract


The European continent remains fragmented with Eastern Europe as the most vulnerable region where the grey zone comprising Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia lacks security and challenges regional security. “Countries in-between” were distinguished in a grey zone basing on common internal and external threats; staying outside major functioning security and economic systems shaped by the EU/NATO and EEU/CSTO, actors of which exert a significant impact on the marginal states; burdened by asymmetry of power interaction with neighboring states and entities; weak and unstable political and economic systems. United by common threats and challenges the grey zones states can search for joint options to escape from the marginal status. Thus, regarding strategic environment and aiming to overcome the existing threats and challenges the grey zone states may navigate within the following options: maintaining current status quo; neutrality with strong guarantees of major powers; relying on strengthened / modified international security mechanisms or establishing new ones; sub-regional cooperation and alliances; bilateral security agreements with the US; joining one of the existing security systems. The author stresses that the most viable and efficient are the last three ones.


Keywords


regional security, Eastern Europe, grey zone, countries-in-between, EU, NATO, Russia, the US, Ukraine, Georgia, Moldova

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bloomberg, https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-04-11/brzezinski-sees-finlandization-ofukraine-as-deal-maker “Brzezinski Sees Finlandization of Ukraine as Deal Maker”, April12, 2014, last entrance: 30.09.2017.

Buzan B., Waever O., Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. New York 2003, p. 570.

Cohen S., Geography and Politics in a World Divided. – London, 1963.

Congress.gov, https://www.congress.gov/bill/113th-congress/senate-bill/2828/text S.2828 – Ukraine Freedom Support Act of 2014, last entrance: 30.11.2017.

Dodds K., Atkinson D., Geopolitical Traditions. A century of geopolitical thought, London 2000, p. 392.

GlobalSecurity.org, https://www.globalsecurity.org/military/agency/dod/mnna.htm “Major Non-NATO Ally (MNNA)”, last entrance: 7.12.2017.

Government of Canada, https://www.canada.ca/en/global-affairs/news/2017/06/address_by_ministerfreelandoncanadasforeignpolicypriorities.html “Address by Minister Freeland on Canada’s foreign policy priorities”, June 6, 2017, last entrance: 1.12.2017.

Kyiv International Institute of Sociology, http://www.kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=reports&id=713&page=1 “Geopolitical orientations and attitude of the residents of Ukraine to the independence of Ukraine”, 20 VIII 2017, last entrance: 1.10.2017.

Lytvynenko O., The Talons of the Double-Headed Eagle: A Sketch of Russian Strategic Culture, Royal College of Defence Studies, London, 2013, p. 34.

National Democratic Institute and CRRC, https://www.ndi.org/publications/ndi-poll-georgians-increasingly-support-eu-and-euro-atlantic-aspirations-view-russia “NDI poll: Georgians increasin gly support EU and Euro-Atlantic aspirations; view Russia as a threat”, May 2017, last entrance: 1.10.2017.

News Agency Infotag, http://www.infotag.md/populis-en/246302/ “52% Moldovans stand for integration with EAES and 42% with EU - Opinion Poll”, May 25, 2017, last entrance: 1.10.2017.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization, http://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_129758.htm’Projecting Stability: Charting NATO’s Future’, Speech by NATO Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg, 6 August, 2016, last entrance: 20.09.2017.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization, https://www.nato.int/cps/ic/natohq/topics_132722.htm “Resilience and Article 3”, 22 June, 2016, last entrance: 20.09.2017.

Official Internet Resources of the President of Russia, http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/6152 “The draft of the European Security Treaty”, November 29, 2009, last entrance: 3.12.2017.

Pew Research Center, http://www.pewglobal.org/2015/06/10/1-nato-public-opinion-wary-of-russialeary-of-action-on-ukraine/ “NATO Public Opinion: Wary of Russia, Leery of Action on Ukraine”, June, 2015, last entrance: 6.12.2017.

The German Council on Foreign Relations (DGAP), https://dgap.org/sites/default/files/article_downloads/ostpolitik_workingpaper_herbst.pdf J. Herbst “Forsaken Territories? The Emergence of Europe-’s Grey Zone and Western Policy”, last entrance: 2.12.2017.

The Warsaw Institute Review, https://warsawinstitute.org/defense-cooperation-between-poland-andukraine-present-state-and-prospects/ Romanowska A., “Defense Cooperation between Poland and Ukraine: Present State and Prospects”, June 2017, last entrance: 6.12.2017.

The Washington Post, https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/henry-kissinger-to-settle-the-ukraine-crisis-start-at-the-end/2014/03/05/46dad868-a496-11e3-8466-d34c451760b9_story.html?utm_term=.55f27ab33ece “Henry Kissinger: To settle the Ukraine crisis, start at the end”, March 5, 2014, last entrance: 30.09.2017.

Верховна Рада України, http://zakon5.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/998_158 «Меморандум про гарантії безпеки у зв’язку з приєднанням України до Договору про нерозповсюдження ядерної зброї», last entrance: 2.12.2017.

Верховна Рада України http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/287/2015 “Про рішення Ради наці ональної безпеки і оборони України від 6 травня 2015 року “Про Стратегію національної безпеки України”, 26 May, 2015, last entrance: 15.09.2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/we.2017.3.2.67
Date of publication: 2018-07-20 12:05:31
Date of submission: 2018-07-20 10:51:41


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1367
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Olena Khylko

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.