Email this article 
Hide
Show all
FinTechs Contribution to Sustainable Development
Abstract
Theoretical background: The FinTechs phenomenon is worth discussing as its multidimensional character causes difficulties not only with defining it but also with assessing the impact of its development on the economy and society. The impact of FinTechs on sustainable development is a relatively new field of research. Thus, the paper presents exploratory research aiming to analyse the current areas of FinTechs activity, the state of their development in Europe, and the state of the art in European research on their impact on sustainable development goals (SDGs) achievement. The study applied both inductive and deductive research methods, together with comparative analysis.
Purpose of the article: The paper aims to analyse the European FinTechs landscape in the context of their impact on sustainability reflected by SDGs and prepare the framework for further research in this field.
Research methods: The theoretical analysis conducted in the paper for defining FinTechs was based on an in-depth literature review, including scientific papers, documents and reports. In this section, the inductive method and comparative analysis were mostly applied. The empirical part of the paper includes the analysis of quantitative data published by the European Commission and Eurostat. This analysis is primarily based on comparative analysis. The framework for further research in this field is based on a systemic literature review (SLR). In this section, the PRISMA methodology was applied.
Main findings: There is no doubt that FinTechs have already influenced the financial systems worldwide. In Europe, their disruptive development motivated the traditional market players to adapt their offerings, strategies and business models. They were perceived as market disruptors at the beginning of their operational activity. Today, the vast majority of authors notice their huge potential as sustainability enablers. The systemic literature review proved the worldwide systematically increasing scientific interest in surveying the FinTechs and their contribution to SDGs achievement. This trend has not yet been observed in Europe. Only a few papers directly refer to the relationship between FinTechs and SDGs achievement in European countries. The results have shed light on existing academic literature embracing both FinTech and SDGs issues in Europe, explored emerging trends in current research, and identified the main areas for further investigation.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alfiani, T., Akbar, N. (2020). Exploring strategies to enhance Zakat Role to support sustainable development goals (SDGs). International Conference of Zakat, 295–310. doi:10.37706/iconz.2020.226
Arner, D.W., Barberis, J.N., & Buckley, R. (2015). The evolution of Fintech: A new post-crisis paradigm? University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper, No. 2015/047. Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313365410_The_Evolution_of_Fintech_A_New_Post-Crisis_Paradigm (p. 4).
Arner, D.W., Barberis, J.N., & Buckley, R.P. (2016). FinTech, RegTech and the reconceptualization of financial regulation. Northwestern Journal of International Law & Business, Forthcoming, University of Hong Kong Faculty of Law Research Paper, No. 2016/035. Retrieved from: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2847806
Arner, D.W., Buckley, R.P. Zetzsche, D.A., & Veidt, R. (2020). Sustainability, FinTech and financial inclusion. European Business Organization Law Review, 21, 7–35. doi:10.1007/s40804-020-00183-y
Baker, L. (2023). New frontiers of electricity capital: Energy access in sub-Saharan Africa. New Political Economy, 28(2), 206–222. doi:10.1080/13563467.2022.2084524
BBVA. (2018). ‘Fintech’, ‘proptech’, ‘femtech’, ‘edtech’ and other related neologisms. Retrieved from: https://www.bbva.com/en/fintech-proptech-femtech-edtech-and-other-related-neologisms/
Błach, J., & Klimontowicz, M. (2021). The determinants of PayTech’s success in the mobile payment market – the case of BLIK. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(9), 422. doi:10.3390/jrfm14090422
Cao, V.H., & Nguyen, M.H. (2023). Financial technology: Implementation experience in some countries and policy implications. Journal of Science and Technology – Binh Duong University, 5(4). doi:10.56097/binhduonguniversityjournalofscienceandtechnology.v5i4.76
Chu, Y., Ye, S., Li, H., Strauss, J., & Zhao, C. (2023). Can digitalization foster sustainable financial inclusion? Opportunities for both banks and vulnerable groups. Sustainability, 15(8), 6727. doi:10.3390/su15086727
Chueca Vergara, C., & Ferruz Agudo, L. (2021). Fintech and sustainability: Do they affect each other? Sustainability, 13, 7012. doi:10.3390/su13137012
Das, S.R. (2018). The Future of FinTech. Retrieved from: https://assets.kpmg.com/content/ (p. 3).
Dimler, N., Joachin, P., & Karcher, B. (2018). Unternehmensfinanzierung im Mittelstand: Lösungsansätze für eine maßgeschneiderte Finanzierung. Wiesbaden: Springer Gabler.
Dziatkovskii, A., Hryneuski, U., Krylova, A., & Loy, A.C.M. (2022). Chronological progress of blockchain in science, technology, engineering and math (STEM): A systematic analysis for emerging future directions. Sustainability, 14(19), 12074. doi:10.3390/su141912074
EU. (2022). The Digital Economy and Society Index (DESI). Retrieved from https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/desi
Eurostat. (2023). Sustainable development in the European Union – Monitoring report on progress towards the SDGs in an EU context. 2023 edition. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-flagship-publications/w/ks-04-23-184
EY. (2017). FinTech Adoption Index 2017. The rapid emergence of FinTech. Retrieved from: https://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/ey-fintech-adoption-index-2017/$FILE/ey-fintech-adoption-index-2017.pdf (p. 5).
Ferrata, L. (2019). Digital financial inclusion – an engine for “leaving no one behind”. Public Sector Economics, 43(4), 445–458.
Feyen, E., Frost, J., Gambacorta, L., Natarajan, H., & Saal, M. (2021). Fintech and the digital transformation of financial services: Implications for market structure and public policy. BIS Papers, No 117. Retrieved from https://www.bis.org/publ/bppdf/bispap117.pdf
FSB. (2017). Financial Stability Implications from FinTech Supervisory and Regulatory Issues that Merit Authorities’ Attention. Financial Stability Board. Retrieved from http://www.fsb.org/wp-content/uploads/R270617.pdf (p. 6).
Gálvez-Sánchez, F.J., Lara-Rubio, J., Verdú-Jóver, A.J., & Meseguer-Sánchez, V. (2021). Research advances on financial inclusion: A bibliometric analysis. Sustainability, 13(6), 3156. doi:10.3390/su13063156
Glavina, S., Aidrus, I., & Trusova, A. (2021). Assessment of the competitiveness of Islamic Fintech implementation: A composite indicator for cross-country analysis. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(12), 602. doi:10.3390/jrfm14120602
Gromek, M. (2018). An overview of the FinTech sector in the greater Stockholm region. Version 2.0. Stockholm Fintech Report.
Jiang, S., Jakobsen, K., Bueie, J., Li, J., & Haro, P.H. (2022). A Tertiary Review on Blockchain and Sustainability With Focus on Sustainable Development Goals. IEEE Access, 10, 114975–115006. doi:10.1109/ACCESS.2022.3217683
Kerényi, Á., & Molnár, J. (2017). The impact of the Fintech phenomenon – radical change occurs in the financial sector? Financial and Economic Review, 16, 33.
Kim Y.H., Young J.P., & Choi, J. (2016). The adoption of mobile payment services for “Fintech”. International Journal of Applied Engineering Research, 11(2), 1058–1061.
King, M.R. (2017). FinTech 101: What Policymakers Need to Know. Understanding Canada’s Fintech Ecosystem. Scotiabank Digital Banking Lab @ Ivey. Retrieved from https://www.ivey.uwo.ca/media/3776399/1_mking-fintech-101-public-sector.pdf
KPMG 2018. The Pulse of Fintech 2018. Retrieved from https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2018/07/h1-2018-pulse-of-fintech.pdf (p. 57).
Kurnoga, N., Šimurina, N., & Fučkan, F. (2022). Performance differences between ESG indices and conventional market indices: A multivariate analysis of indices. Zagreb International Review of Economics & Business, 25, 85–103. doi:10.2478/zireb-2022-0026
Laidroo, L., Koroleva E., Kliber, A., Rupeika-Apoga, R., & Grigaliunienie, Z. (2021). Business models of FinTechs – difference in similarity? Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 46, 101034. doi:10.1016/j.elerap.2021.101034
Le, T.T., Dang, N.D.L., Nguyen, T.D.T., Vu, T.S.,Tran, M.D. (2019). Determinants of financial inclusion: Comparative study of Asian Countries. Asian Economic and Financial Review, 9(10), 1107–1123. doi:10.18488/journal.aefr.2019.910.1107.1123
McAuley, D. (2015). What Is FinTech? Wharton FinTech. Retrieved from https://www.whartonfintech.org/
McKinsey & Co. (2022). Europe’s fintech opportunity. Retrieved from https://www.mckinsey.com/~/media/mckinsey/industries/financial%20services/our%20insights/europes%20fintech%20opportunity/europes-fintech-opportunity-full-report.pdf
Michael, B., & Latkovska, T. (2021). The FinTech dividend: How much money is FinTech likely to mobilise for sustainable development? Global Policy 12(5), 677–688.
Micu, I., & Micu, A. (2016). Financial technology (Fintech) and its implementation on the Romanian non-banking capital market. SEA – Practical Application of Science, 11, 379–384.
Pesin, I. (2017). FinTech Results 2016: Banks and Regulators. Medium.com. Retrieved from https://medium.com/@igorpesin/fintech-results-2016-banks-and-regulators-3e2a003afd7d
Pauliukevičienė, G., & Stankevičienė, J. (2021). Assessing statistical link between FinTech PEST environment and achievement of SDGs. Public and Municipal Finance, 10(1), pp. 47–66. doi:10.21511/pmf.10(1).2021.05
Pauliukevičienė, G., & Stankevičienė, J. (2022). Assessment of the impact of sustainable development goals indicators on the sustainable development of fintech industry. 12th International Scientific Conference Business and Management 2022, Vilnius, Lithuania. doi:10.3846/bm.2022.759
Rizzello, A., & Kabli (2020). Social finance and sustainable development goals: A literature synthesis, current approaches and research agenda. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 9, 120–136. doi:10.35944/jofrp.2020.9.1.010
Sachs, J.D., Lafortune, G., Kroll, Ch., Fuller, G., & Woelm, F. (2022). Sustainable Development Report. From Crisis to Sustainable Development: The SDGs as Roadmap to 2030 and Beyond. doi:10.1017/9781009210058
Schueffel, P. (2016). Taming the beast: A scientific definition of Fintech. Journal of Innovation Management, 4(4), 36.
Siemionek-Ruskań, M., Lepczyński, B., & Fanea-Ivanovici, M. (2022). A comparative analysis of green finance awareness in Poland and Romania. Journal of Environmental Management and Tourism, 13/7(63), 1825–1834. doi:10.14505/jemt.v13.7(63).02
Stamegna, C., & Karakas, C. (2019). Fintech (financial technology) and the European Union state of play and outlook. Briefing EPRS | European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieved from https://www.fintech2019.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/EPRS_BRI2019635513_EN.pdf (p. 1).
Susilowati, E., Joseph, C., Vendy, V., & Yuhertiana, I. (2022). Advancing SDG No 16 via Corporate governance disclosure: Evidence from Indonesian and Malaysian Fintech companies’ websites. Sustainability, 14(21), 13869. doi:10.3390/su142113869
Trimulato, T. (2022). The role Sharia non-bank financial institutions to support SDGS Program. Al-Arbah: Journal of Islamic Finance and Banking, 4(1), 79–106. doi:10.21580/al-arbah.2022.4.1.14668
UN. (2015). Addis Ababa Action Agenda of the Third International Conference on Financing for Development. Resolution adopted by the General Assembly on July 27, 2015. Retrieved from https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ares69d313_en.pdf
World Economic Forum. 2017. Beyond Fintech: A Pragmatic Assessment of Disruptive Potential in Financial Services. Part of the Future of Financial Services. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/Beyond_Fintech_-_A_Pragmatic_Assessment_of_Disruptive_Potential_in_Financial_Services.pdf (p. 5).
Úbeda, F., Forcadell, F.J., Aracil, E., & Mendez, A. (2022). How sustainable banking fosters the SDG 10 in weak institutional environments. Journal of Business Research, 146, 277–287. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.03.065
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2023.57.4.103-121
Date of publication: 2023-12-23 17:34:10
Date of submission: 2023-07-13 12:29:35
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Monika Klimontowicz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.