Does Organizational Support Really Influence Satisfaction and Well-Being During Enforced Working from Home?

Marcin Butlewski, Wiktoria Czernecka, Piotr Janiszewski, Joanna Bogajewska-Danek, Brigita Gajsek, Marcin Suszyński, Jinal Parikh

Abstract


Theoretical background: The transition to enforced working from home (EWfH) due to the COVID-19 pandemic has dramatically altered work dynamics, necessitating a reevaluation of traditional labor relations and service delivery. This shift underscores the need for comprehensive organizational support, with theoretical frameworks like the job demands-resources (JD-R) model and work-life boundary management theory highlighting the impact of remote work on employee well-being, productivity, and job satisfaction. These frameworks suggest that well-being is influenced by the balance between job demands and resources, and how individuals manage work-life boundaries, laying the groundwork for exploring how organizational support can address EWfH challenges.

Purpose of the article: This article aims to delve into organizational support during EWfH and its impact on employee well-being. It focuses on identifying critical support aspects and their influence on subjective well-being, providing insights into effective remote work practices and guiding organizations in supporting their workforce post-pandemic.

Research methods: Employing a mixed-methods approach, the study surveyed 429 Polish employees across different sectors, complemented by qualitative interviews for deeper insight. This methodology enabled the collection of comprehensive data on employer support perceptions and their impact on remote working well-being, analyzed through statistical and thematic analysis methods.

Main findings: Key findings underscore the importance of effective communication, resource access, well-being support, and career growth opportunities as crucial organizational support aspects for remote employees. A significant correlation was found between organizational support levels and enhanced employee well-being, with higher support linked to reduced stress, improved work-life balance, and increased job satisfaction. The study also emphasizes the need for personalized support strategies, accounting for individual differences and home working environments, to foster a positive remote working experience and ensure long-term productivity and well-being. The main application of your paper, which examines the impact of company policies on employee well-being during EWfH, could be the development of a comprehensive guide or toolkit for organizations to better support their remote workforce. This application would be particularly relevant to HR departments, managers and organizational leaders.


Keywords


well-being; organizational support; ergonomics

Full Text:

PDF

References


Achterberg, M., Dobbelaar, S., Boer, O.D., & Crone, E.A. (2021). Perceived stress as mediator for longitudinal effects of the COVID-19 lockdown on well-being of parents and children. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-85643-2

Beck, T., & Libert, S. (2020). Organizational culture in the age of enforced remote work: Examining the impact on corporate culture. Corporate Culture and Performance, 18(1), 58–76.

Blake, H., Yildirim, M., Wood, B., Knowles, S., Mancini, H., Coyne, E., & Cooper, J. (2020). COVID-Well: Evaluation of the implementation of supported well-being centres for hospital employees during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(24), 9401. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249401

Brooks, S.K., Webster, R.K., Smith, L.E., Woodland, L., Wessely, S., Greenberg, N., & Rubin, G.J. (2020). The psychological impact of quarantine and how to reduce it: Rapid review of the evidence. Lancet, 395, 912–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30460-8

Butlewski, M. (2020). Well-being through design for dynamic diversity: The voice of minorities in design for all. In Advances in Social and Occupational Ergonomics: Proceedings of the AHFE 2019 International Conference on Social and Occupational Ergonomics, July 24–28, 2019, Washington DC, USA (vol. 10, pp. 49–56). Springer International Publishing.

Daniels, K., Lamond, D., & Standen, P. (2020). Telework and the integration of work and home life: The role of the residential environment. Applied Ergonomics, 85, 103082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.103082

Duraku, Z.H., & Hoxha, L. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on education and on the well-being of teachers, parents, and students: Challenges related to remote (online) learning and opportunities for advancing the quality of education. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/341297812

Ewertowski, T. (2022). A standard-based concept of the integration of the corporate recovery management systems: Coping with adversity and uncertainty during a pandemic. Sustainability, 14(3), 1254. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031254

Ewertowski, T., & Butlewski, M. (2021). Development of a pandemic residual risk assessment tool for building organizational resilience within Polish enterprises. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13), 6948. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18136948

Franklin, P., & Gruenwald, S. (2021). Navigating the digital divide: Remote work challenges and opportunities in the age of COVID-19. Journal of Business and Information Technology, 20(2), 210–225.

Harper, A., & Satchell, L.P. (2020). Remote work and sustainability: An examination of environmental impacts of remote work practices. Sustainability, 12(8), 3364. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083364

Kurtessis, J.N., Eisenberger, R., Ford, M.T., Buffardi, L.C., Stewart, K.A., & Adis, C.S. (2017). Perceived organizational support: A meta-analytic evaluation of organizational support theory. Journal of Management, 43, 1854–1884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315575554

Kyrönlahti, S., Neupane, S., Nygård, C.H., Oakman, J., Juutinen, S., & Mäkikangas, A. (2022). Perceived work ability during enforced working from home due to the COVID-19 pandemic among Finnish higher educational staff. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(10), 6230. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19106230

Lee, H. (2021). Changes in workplace practices during the COVID-19 pandemic: The roles of emotion, psychological safety, and organisation support. Journal of Organizational Effectiveness: People and Performance. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOEPP-06-2020-0104

Lekamwasam, R., & Lekamwasam, S. (2020). Effects of COVID-19 pandemic on health and well-being of older people: A comprehensive review. Annals of Geriatric Medicine and Research, 24(3), 166. https://doi.org/10.4235/agmr.20.0027

Lilja, J., Fladmark, S., Nuutinen, S., Bordi, L., Larjovuori, R.L., Innstrand, S.T., Christensen, M., & Heikkilä-Tammi, K. (2022). COVID-19-related job demands and resources, organizational support, and employee well-being: A study of two Nordic countries. Challenges, 13(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/challe13010010

MacIntyre, P.D., Gregersen, T., & Mercer, S. (2020). Language teachers’ coping strategies during the Covid-19 conversion to online teaching: Correlations with stress, well-being, and negative emotions. System, 94, 102352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2020.102352

Mari, E., Lausi, G., Fraschetti, A., Pizzo, A., Baldi, M., Quaglieri, A., Burrai, J., Barchielli, B., Avallone, F., & Giannini, A.M. (2021). Teaching during the pandemic: A comparison in psychological well-being among smart working professions. Sustainability, 13(9), 4850. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094850

Matos, R.A.D.C., Akutsu, R., Zandonadi, R.P., Rocha, A., & Botelho, R.B.A. (2020). Wellbeing at work before and during the SARS-COV-2 pandemic: A Brazilian nationwide study among dietitians. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(15), 5541. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17155541

Mattern, J., Lansmann, S., & Hüllmann, J. (2021, March). It’s not that bad! Perceived stress of knowledge workers during enforced working from home due to COVID-19. In International Conference on Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 263–279). Springer.

Merchant, J. (2021). Working online due to the COVID-19 pandemic: A research and literature review. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 66(3), 484–505. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5922.12666

Misztal, A., & Butlewski, M. (2012). Life Improvement at Work. Publishing House of Poznan University of Technology.

Morrison, E., & Milliken, F. J. (2021). Remote leadership: A review of the challenges and opportunities for leading from a distance. Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101420

Nguyen, H., & Lai, K. (2022). Enforced working from home and work-family conflict: Strategies for mitigating work-family conflict in remote work settings. Journal of Family Issues, 43(3), 622–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X20980273

Pant, N., & Jain, K. (2022). Exploring the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on perceived organizational support of Indian professional millennials. International Journal of Education and Management Studies, 12(1), 67–73.

Patel, R., & Smith, J. (2020). Health implications of remote work: From physical inactivity to psychosocial stress. Health Promotion International, 35(4), 790–798. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/daaa042

Platts, K., Breckon, J., & Marshall, E. (2022). Enforced home-working under lockdown and its impact on employee well-being: A cross-sectional study. BMC Public Health, 22(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-12507-5

Rodriguez, M.A., & Vega, D. (2021). Adapting to remote work: The role of community and social support for the remote workforce. Management Communication Quarterly, 35(1), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318920959805

Smite, D., Moe, N.B., Klotins, E., & Gonzalez-Huerta, J. (2021). From forced working-from-home to working-from-anywhere: Two revolutions in telework. arXiv preprint arXiv, 2101.08315.

Thompson, R.J., & Johnson, E.M. (2020). The impact of enforced remote work on mental health and productivity: Insights from a survey of professionals. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 25(4), 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000184

Waizenegger, L., McKenna, B., Cai, W., & Bendz, T. (2020). An affordance perspective of team collaboration and enforced working from home during COVID-19. European Journal of Information Systems, 29(4), 429–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/0960085X.2020.1814680

Wellbeing Measures Bank. (2021, February 1). Evaluating Wellbeing. https://measure.whatworkswellbeing.org/measures-bank/

Yu, J., & Wu, Y. (2021). The impact of enforced working from home on employee job satisfaction during COVID-19: An event system perspective. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(24), 13207. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413207

Zimmerman, F., & Kulik, C.T. (2021). When work comes home: Coping strategies for remote working parents. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 118, 103435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2020.103435




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2024.58.3.203-215
Date of publication: 2024-07-12 06:50:14
Date of submission: 2024-03-18 21:23:15


Statistics


Total abstract view - 367
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Marcin Butlewski, Wiktoria Czernecka, Piotr Janiszewski, Joanna Bogajewska-Danek, Brigita Gajsek, Marcin Suszyński, Jinal Parikh

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.