Le principe de concision en argot pénitentiaire

Alicja Dziedzic-Rawska

Résumé


Le numéro contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.


Mots-clés


prison slang; principle of pithiness; metaphor; metonymy

Texte intégral :

PDF (English)

Références


https://www.amnesty.org/en/documents/AMR51/035/1998/en/

https://www.hrw.org/legacy/advocacy/prisons/u-s.htm

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=WIC&division=5.&title=∂=1.&chapter=2.&article=1

Cambell, G. 1868. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. New York: Harper & Brothers.

Cowley, S. J. 2004. Contextualizing bodies: Human infants and distributed cognition. Language Sciences, 26, 565-591.

Davison, D. 1981. What metaphors mean. In: M Johnson (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 200-220.

Dumas, B. K., Lighter, J. 1978. Is slang a word for linguists?. American Speech, 53(1), 5-17.

Gibbs, R. W. 1992. Categorization and metaphor understanding. Psychological Review, 99(3), 572-577.

Gibbs, R. W. (ed.). 2009. The Cambridge Handbook of Metaphor and Thought. Cambridge/New York: CUP.

Green, J. 2010. Green’s Dictionary of Slang. London: Chambers Harrap Publishers.

Halliday, M. A. K. 1976. Anti-Languages. American Anthropologist, 78(3), 570-584.

Halliwell, S. (transl.). 1995. Aristotle Poetics. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.

Hofstede, G. 2001. Culture’s Consequences. Comparing Values, Behaviors, Institutions, and Organizations across Nations. Thousand Oaks/London/New Delhi: Sage Publications.

Irwin, J., Cressey, D. R. 1962. Thieves, convicts and the inmate culture. Social Problems, 10(2), 142-155.

Johnson, M. 1981. Introduction: Metaphor in the philosophical tradition. In: M. Johnson (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives on Metaphor. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 3-47.

Kecskés, I. 2008. Dueling contexts: A dynamic model of meaning. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 385-406.

Kecskés, I. 2015. Language, culture, and context. In: F. Sharifian (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. London/New York: Routledge, 113-129.

Kövecses, Z. 2006. Language, Mind, and Culture. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kövecses, Z. 2015. Where Metaphors Come From. Reconsidering Context in Metaphor. Oxford/New York: OUP.

Kravchenko, A. V. 2007. Essential properties of language, or, why language is not a code. Language Sciences, 29, 650-671.

Kroskrity, P. V. 2001. Identity. In: A. Duranti (ed.), Key Terms in Language and Culture. Malden/Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 106-109.

Lakoff, G., Johnson, M. 1980. The metaphorical structure of the human conceptual system. Cognitive Science, 4(2), 195-208.

Love, N. 2007. Are languages digital codes? Language Sciences, 29, 690-709.

Ogden, C. K., Richards, I. A. 1946. The Meaning of Meaning. New York: Harcourt Brace.

Richards, I. A. 1936. The Philosophy of Rhetoric. London/Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.

Risager, K. 2014. The language-culture nexus in transnational perspective. In: F. Sharifian (ed.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Culture. London/New York: Routledge, 87-99.

Salzmann, Z. 2007. Language, Culture, and Society. Boulder: Westview Press.

Samovar, L. A., Porter, R. E. 1994. Intercultural Communication. A Reader. Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Sapir, E. 1929. The status of linguistics as a science. Language, 5, 207-214.

Van Dijk, T. A. 2009. Society and Discourse: How Social Contexts Influence Text and Talk. Cambridge: CUP.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2017.41.2.12
Date of publication: 2018-01-02 15:01:02
Date of submission: 2017-04-22 10:30:10


Statistiques


Visibilité des résumés - 1109
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (English) - 674

Indicateurs



Renvois

  • Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.


Droit d'auteur (c) 2018, Alicja Dziedzic-Rawska

Licence Creative Commons
Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.