The Relationship Between Project-Based Creative Learning and Well-Being Focusing on Whole Personality Development in Teacher Education. A Case Study
Abstract
In this research paper, we seek to examine how participation in a community art project can promote positive psychological and social outcomes. We aim to outline the processes through which the experience of participation in community arts is transformed into positive personal developmental outcomes.In order to give evidences and examples of this relationship and balance, this research study focuses on some models of creativity and case study in teacher education on the base of community arts. In Slovakia, community art has not yet drawn significant research attention in regards to its potential as a creativity development strategy in higher education. A gap remains in understanding how and why students’s participation in a community art project can lead to those positive outcomes. Aiming to respond to this gap, the following research exploredthe meaning of creativity and whole personality development in a community art project from the point of the students who experienced it. Twelve participants were interviewed about their experiences in a community art project (University Totem) held in Komárno, Slovakia. The findings highlighted the potential of community arts projects for promoting the creative process and community building through learning various clay-making techniques. Finally, at the end of the research paper, we will draw conclusions and summarize our paper.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Anderson, L.W., & Krathwohl, D.R. (2001): A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom’s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Longman.
Báthory, Z. (2000). Tanulók, iskolák-különbségek. OKKER Oktatási Kiadó.
Beghetto, R.A., & Kaufman, J.C. (2007). Toward a broader conception of creativity: A case for mini-c creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 1, 73–79
Bronson, P., & Merryman, A. (2010). The creativity crisis. Newsweek. https://www.newsweek.com/creativity-crisis-74665
Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. Sage.
Charmaz, K. (2003). Grounded theory. In J.A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative Psychology: A Practical Guide to Research Methods (pp. 81–110). Sage.
Cohen, L.M. (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. Creativity Research Journal, 2, 169–183.
Committee for Children. (n.d.). What Is Social-Emotional Learning? Helping Everyone Thrive. https://www.cfchildren.org/what-is-social-emotional-learning/
Congdon, K.G., Blandy, D., & Bolin, P.E. (2001): Histories of Community-Based Art Education. National Art Education Association.
Council Recommendation of 22 May 2018 on key competences for lifelong learning (Text with EEA relevance) Brussles, 2018/C 189/01. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32018H0604(01)
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. HarperCollins.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. Collier Books.
Gardner, H. (1993). Frames of Mind: The Theory of Multiple Intelligence. Fontana Press Imprint of HarperCollins.
GRLI (Globally Responsible Leadership Initiative). (n.d.). Whole Person Learning (WPL). https://grli.org/initiatives/whole-person-learning-wpl/
Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5,. 444–454.
Guilford, J.P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill.
Jackson, N. (2017). Foreword. In L.S. Watts & P. Blessinger (Eds.), Creative Learning in Higher Education. International Perspectives and Approaches. Routledge.
Kim, K.H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? Journal of Secondary Gifted Education, 16, 57–66.
Langdon, P. (1996). Community art education: Issues for teacher training. In F. Gagnon-Bourget & P. Gosselin (Eds.), Actes du Colloque sur la Recherche en Enseignement des Arts Visuels (pp. 41–43). CRÉA Éditions.
Michigan Department of Education. (n.d.). Whole Child Definition. https://www.michigan.gov/mde/resources/michigans-top-10-strategic-education-plan/definitions/whole-child
Runco, M.A. (1996). Personal creativity: Definition and developmental issues. New Directions for Child Development, 72, 3–30.
Silvia, P.J. (2008). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1012–1021.
Sinner, A., Levesque, M., Vaughan, K., Szabad-Smyth, L., Garnet, D., & Fitch, S. (2012). Reviewing an archive of practice: The historical unfolding of community art education. Canadian Review of Art Education, 39, 24–45.
Sternberg, R.J., & O’Hara, L. (1999). Creativity and intelligence. In R.J. Sternberg, R.J. (Eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 251–272). Cambridge University Press.
UNESCO. (2023). UNESCO’s education response to COVID-19. https://www.unesco.org/en/covid-19/education-response/initiatives
Vygotsky, L.S. (2004). Imagination and creativity in childhood. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 42, 7–97.
Willig, C. (2001). Introducing Qualitative Research in Psychology: Adventures in Theory And Method. Open University Press.
www1: Oxford English Dictionary, s.v. “totem (n.), sense 1.a,” https://www.oed.com/dictionary/totem_n?tl=true
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/pe.2024.8.193-207
Date of publication: 2024-12-13 13:07:08
Date of submission: 2024-05-06 12:00:14
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Vilmos Vass
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.