Managing Migration in the United States and the European Union – Maintaining the Security

Lehte Roots

Abstract


The article reflexes the nexus between security and migration management. Immigration is often seen as threat to national security but in case of refugees they are the victims of the instability and lack of protection of their human rights. The article aims to analyse how the human security concept is discussed in EU policies and how it has been implemented to tackle the migration crisis. The approach of the USA to migration and security will be used for the comparative analysis. The article discusses the historical and legal developments of migration management and the effects and problematics in the open world. Since the EU and the USA are the world big players, they should stay the leaders in promoting human rights and security. The way to do it is to introduce homogeneous policies in terms of migration management.


Keywords


migration management; United States; European Union; migration; security; human rights; migration crisis

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barnes R., Supreme Court Won’t Revive Obama Plan to Shield Illegal Immigrants from Deportation, “The Washington Post”, June 23, 2016, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/supreme-court-wont-revive-obama-plan-to-shield-illegal-immigrants-from-deportation/2016/06/23/6cea5f1e-3950-11e6-9ccd-d6005beac8b3_story.html [access: 8.11.2020].

Booth K., Theory of World Security, Cambridge 2007.

Bradford A., The Brussels Effect. How the European Union Rules the World, New York 2020.

Cottey A., Security in 21st Century Europe, New York 2012.

Cox A., Rodríguez C.M., The President and Immigration Law, Oxford 2020.

Glume G., Rehrl J., Handbook on CSDP Missions and Operations – the Common Security and Defence Policy of the European Union, Vienna 2015, https://eeas.europa.eu/archives/docs/csdp/structures-instruments-agencies/european-security-defence-college/pdf/handbook/final_-_handbook_on_csdp_missions_and_operations.pdf [access: 8.11.2020].

Krieg A., Motivations for Humanitarian Intervention: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations, Netherlands 2013.

Maslow W., Recasting Our Deportation Law: Proposals for Reform, “Columbia Law Review” 1956, vol. 56(3).

Münkler H., The New Wars, Cambridge 2005.

Nakamura D., Costa R., Fahrenthold D.A., Obama Announces Immigration Overhaul Shielding 4 Million from Deportation, “The Washington Post”, November 20, 2014, https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/obama-immigration-plan-will-shield-37- [access: 12.11.2020].

Nuruzzaman M., Paradigms in Conflict: The Contested Claims of Human Security, Critical Theory and Feminism, “Cooperation and Conflict” 2006, vol. 41(3), http://cac.sagepub.com/content/41/3/285.full.pdf+html [access: 8.11.2020].

Park J., Europe’s Migration Crisis, Council on Foreign Relations, September 23, 2015, https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/europes-migration-crisis [access: 8.11.2020].

Roots L., The Impact of the Lisbon Treaty on the Development of EU Immigration Legislation, “Croatian Yearbook of European Law and Policy” 2009, vol. 5(5). DOI:10.3935/cyelp.05.2009.92

Roots L., Irregular Migration in European Union after Lisbon, “L’Europe Unie” 2012, vol. 6.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/ppa.2020.3.145-160
Date of publication: 2021-09-05 23:24:17
Date of submission: 2020-11-12 15:36:45


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1294
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 430

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.