Legal Act as the Subject of Mythologization: Remarks on the Reception of the JUST Act of 2017 in Poland

Bartosz Kwiatkowski

Abstract


The article presents a legal act as a potential subject of mythologization. The tools derived from the studies on political myth were used to describe a phenomenon that strictly belongs to the political and legal reality – the American JUST Act of 2017, which in recent years has caused many controversies in Polish public debate. While using the theoretical methods of the most notable researchers of the political myth, such as R. Barthes or E. Cassirer, it has been shown that legal acts, as well as their reception and interpretation, are not always based on rational forms of cognition. They can also be affected by a political myth and a mythical form of cognition, which is depicted in this study by means of methodology implemented from the studies on political myth. The article formulates interesting comments that may be useful for a better understanding of the phenomena on the border of Polish jurisprudence, political science and mythology.


Keywords


political myth; legal act; the JUST Act; mythologization

References


LITERATURE

Barthes R., Mit i znak, Warszawa 1970.

Bernatowicz Ł., Reprywatyzacja na przykładzie gruntów warszawskich, Warszawa 2015.

Biernat T., Mit polityczny, Warszawa 1989.

Borecki P., Reprywatyzacja nieruchomości na rzecz gmin wyznaniowych żydowskich, „Państwo i Prawo” 2011, no. 6.

Cassirer E., Mit państwa, Warszawa 2006.

Eliade M., Aspekty mitu, Warszawa 1998.

Eliade M., Mity, sny, misteria, Warszawa 1999.

Kociubiński P., Powojenne przekształcenia własnościowe w świetle konstytucji, Warszawa 2013.

Leder A., Prześniona rewolucja. Ćwiczenia z logiki historycznej, Warszawa 2014.

Napiórkowski M., Mitologia współczesna, Warszawa 2018.

Postępowania reprywatyzacyjne, ed. K. Wiktor, Warszawa 2018.

Reprywatyzacja w orzecznictwie sądów, ed. M. Pilch, Warszawa 2016.

NETOGRAPHY

European Shoah Legacy Institute, www.shoahlegacy.org [access: 27.11.2019].

Justice for Uncompensated Survivors Today (JUST) Act of 2017, www.congress.gov/115/plaws/publ171/PLAW-115publ171.pdf [access: 27.01.2020].

Projekt ustawy „Stop 447”, https://stop447.info/wp-content/uploads/2019/09/OIU-STOP447-projekt-ustawy-vo.pdf [access: 3.12.2019].

Roszczenia żydowskie. Antypolonizm żydów w USA ma długą tradycję, www.youtube.com/watch?v=kGQRL3UfF6o [access: 1.12.2019].

Stelmach A., „JUST Act” i duch Bartoszewskiego. Co dalej z żydowskimi roszczeniami?, 15.02.2019, www.pch24.pl/just-act-i-duch-bartoszewskiego--co-dalej-z-zydowskimi-roszczeniami--,59810,i.html [access: 27.01.2021].

Terezin Declaration of 30 June 2009, https://wjro.org.il/cms/assets/uploads/2019/06/terezin_declaration.pdf [access: 27.01.2020].

The JUST Act Report, www.state.gov/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/JUST-Act5.pdf [access: 11.01.2021].

Wałach M., „Stop 447”. Czy narodowcy obronią Polskę przed roszczeniami?, 8.11.2019, www.pch24.pl/stop-447--czy-narodowcy-obronia-polske-przed-roszczeniami-,72041,i.html [access: 27.01.2021].




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2021.30.1.167-179
Date of publication: 2021-03-31 14:40:24
Date of submission: 2020-12-22 23:59:20


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1156
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0 PDF (Język Polski) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Bartosz Kwiatkowski

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.