Perception of Mediation and Online Mediation by Trainee Attorney-at-Law at the Lublin Bar Association of Attorneys-at-Law
Abstract
The phenomenon of popularisation of alternative methods of conflict resolution is widespread in Poland, both at the state and self-government levels. Combining the interdisciplinary achievements of practice and doctrine, numerous projects and programmes are being developed to encourage parties and professional lawyers to use mediation in the process of dispute resolution. However, on the basis of statistical data showing the use of judicial mediation in cases where it could have been used at a level of 1.6%, it should be concluded that there is still a long way to go before mediation becomes a ‘fully-fledged’ method of conflict resolution, constituting a viable alternative to the traditional adjudicative method of dispute resolution. The purpose of the article is to present the results of empirical research conducted by the authors within the framework of scientific activities related to the implementation of the assumptions of the Academic Mediation Centre operating at the Institute of Legal Sciences of Maria Curie-Skłodowska University (Lublin). The article consists of three parts. The first one presents the subject, scope and objectives of the research, as well as the research hypotheses and methodological details. The second part presents the results of the empirical research conducted and the partial conclusions. The last part is a summary of the conclusions of the research carried out.
Keywords
References
LITERATURE
Bettin M., Kowalczyk J., Postępowanie mediacyjne w świetle danych statystycznych. Sądy rejonowe i okręgowe w latach 2006–2019. Edycja 9, Warszawa 2020.
Bettin M., Kowalczyk J., Postępowanie mediacyjne w świetle danych statystycznych. Sądy rejonowe i okręgowe w latach 2006–2021. Edycja 13, Warszawa 2022.
Kalisz A., Zienkiewicz A., Mediacja sądowa i pozasądowa. Zarys wykładu, Warszawa 2014.
Karpiuk M., Crisis Management vs. Cyber Threats, “Sicurezza, Terrorismo e Societa” 2022, vol. 2.
Kępa M., Pilipiec S., Perspektywy zawodowe studentów prawa, Lublin 2021.
Kępa M., Pilipiec S., Preferencje zawodowe studentów prawa. Raport z badania, Lublin 2018.
Kępa M., Pilipiec S., The Prestige of Legal Professions among Students of Law and the Intention to Practice These Professions, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2019, vol. 28(4), DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2019.28.4.65-87.
Kostrubiec J., The Position of the Computer Security Incidents Response Teams in the National Cybersecurity System, “Cybersecurity and Law” 2022, vol. 8(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.35467/cal/157121.
Pieniążek A., Stefaniuk M., Socjologia prawa. Zarys wykładu, Warszawa 2021.
Pilipiec S., Niewęgłowski K., Patoleta P., Awareness among the Students of Law within the Scope of Working as an Attorney-at-Law, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2019, vol. 28(1), DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2019.28.1.117-131.
Plucińska-Nowak M., Status i oblicza mediacji w społeczeństwie polskim, Poznań 2021.
Zemke-Górecka A., Rogula C., Trzy uwagi związane z mediacją online, [in:] Mediacja: w kierunku ugody, ed. M. Romanowski, Warszawa 2021.
ONLINE SOURCES
Akademickie Centrum Mediacji, https://www.umcs.pl/pl/nasze-cele,23125.htm (access: 20.11.2023).
Centrum Mediacji, http://mediacje.kirp.pl (access: 20.11.2023).
Centrum Mediacji przy Naczelnej Radzie Adwokackiej, http://centrummediacji.nra.pl (access: 20.11.2023).
Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości, Mediacja w strukturze Ministerstwa Sprawiedliwości, https://www.gov.pl/web/sprawiedliwosc/dzialania-ministerstwa-sprawiedliwosci-w-przedmiocie-mediacji (access: 20.11.2023).
Ministerstwo Sprawiedliwości, Projekt Krajowy Rejestr Mediatorów, https://www.gov.pl/web/sprawiedliwosc/projekt-krm2 (access: 20.11.2023).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.4.117-132
Date of publication: 2023-12-22 22:04:31
Date of submission: 2023-09-21 23:31:50
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Sławomir Pilipiec, Patryk Patoleta
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.