Realism and Idealization in the Representation of Peasants in Virgil’s Georgics
Abstract
It is commonly said that Virgil, in the Georgics, outlines a realistic picture of the work in fields and rural life, with its hardness and challenges; this is true only to some extent. He provides, in fact, an explication for the origin and necessity of work that is substantially a theodicy, since the end of the Golden Age is traced back to Jupiter’s decision, aimed at pushing men to develop their skills and to discover arts and techniques: work is therefore justified as a means to redeem human dignity, which was lowered by slumber and idleness. Besides, the life of peasants is praised as a blessed condition, as it is far from war and violence: it is presented indeed as the last stronghold of Justice (personified as a deity) that left human world. Thus, realism gives way to idealization of peasants with the moral purpose to elevate them as a model of the precious values that Roman society had long been lacking: rightness and peace.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
P. Vergili Maronis Opera, ed. M. Geymonat, 2nd edition, Roma 2008.
Virgil, Georgics, pref. R.G.M. Nisbet, ed. R.A.B. Mynors, Oxford 1990.
Virgil, Georgics, vols. 1–2, ed. R. Thomas, Cambridge 1988.
Albrecht M. von, Vergil. Bucolica, Georgica, Aeneis. Eine Einführung, Heidelberg 2006.
André J.-M., Recherches sur l’otium romain, Besançon 1962.
Asztalos M., Agricultural Technique and Relentless Toil in Virgil’s Georgica, in: Symbolae septentrionales. Latin Studies Presented to Jan Öberg, eds. M. Asztalos, C. Gejrot, Stockholm 1995.
Barchiesi A., Lettura del secondo libro delle Georgiche, in: Lecturae Vergilianae, vol. 2, Le Georgiche, ed. M. Gigante, Napoli 1982.
Borgna A., Augusto al potere: mores, exempla, consensus, in: Princeps legibus solutus, ed. A. Maffi, Torino 2016.
Cucchiarelli A., A Commentary on Virgil’s Eclogues, Oxford 2023.
Curtius E.R., Europäische Literatur und lateinisches Mittelalter, Bern 1948.
Dahlmann H., Der Bienenstaat in Vergils Georgica, “Akademie der Wissenschaften und der Literatur” 1954, 10.
Dettenhofer M., Herrschaft und Widerstand im augusteischen Principal. Die Konkurrenz zwischen res publica und domus Augusta, Stuttgart 2000.
Ernout A., Meillet A., Dictionnaire étymologique de la langue latine. Histoire des mots, 4th edition (rev. and enlarg. J. André), Paris 1985.
Fowler D., The Didactic Plot, in: Matrices of Genre: Authors, Canons, and Society, eds. M. Depew, D. Obbink, Cambridge MA 2000.
Gale M., Virgil on the Nature of Things: The Georgics, Lucretius and the Didactic Tradition, Cambridge 2000.
Galinsky K., Augustus: Introduction to the Life of an Emperor, Cambridge 2012.
Gruen E.S., Augustus and the Making of the Principate, in: The Cambridge Companion to the Age of Augustus, ed. K. Galinsky, Cambridge 2005.
Hardie P., Lucretian Receptions: History, the Sublime, Knowledge, Cambridge–New York 2009.
Haβ P., Der locus amoenus in der antiken Literatur, Bamberg 1998.
Heckel H., Das Widerspenstige zähmen. Die Funktion der militärischen und politischen Sprache in Vergils Georgica, Trier 1998.
Holzberg H., Vergil. Der Dichter und sein Werk, München 2006.
Horsfall N., A Companion to the Study of Virgil, Leiden 1995.
Jenkyns R., Labor Improbus, “Classical Quarterly” 1993, 43.
Jenkyns R., Virgil’s Experience: Nature and History, Times, Names, and Places, Oxford 1998.
Johnston P.A., Vergil’s Agricultural Golden Age. A Study of the Georgics, Leiden 1980.
La Penna A., A. La Penna, Esiodo nella cultura e nella poesia di Virgilio, in: Hésiode et son influence. Six exposés et discussions par K. von Fritz, G. S. Kirk, W. J. Verdenius, Fr. Solmsen, A. La Penna, P. Grimal, Vandœuvres–Genève [1962] (Entretiens Hardt, 7).
La Penna A., L’impossibile giustificazione della storia. Un’interpretazione di Virgilio, Roma–Bari 2005.
Malaspina E., La Valle di Tempe: descrizione geografica, modelli letterari e archetipi del ‘locus amoenus’, “Studi Urbinati” (B) 1990, 63.
Marangoni C., Tua, Maecenas, haud mollia iussa. Materiali e appunti per la storia di un topos proemiale, “Incontri triestini di filologia classica” 2002–2003, 2.
Nappa C., Reading after Actium: Vergil’s Georgics, Octavian, and Rome, Ann Arbor 2005.
Nelson S.A., God and the Land: The Metaphysics of Farming in Hesiod and Vergil, New York 1998.
Papaioannou S., Embracing Vergil’s ‘Arcadia’: Constructions and Representations of a Literary topos in the Poetry of the Augustans, in: Arcadia, the Golden Age, and the locus amoenus: Idyllic poetic landscapes of early Rome and their later repercussions, eds. P.A. Johnston, S. Papaioannou, “Acta Antiqua” 2013, 53.
Pavloskis Z., Man in a Poetic Landscape. Humanization of Nature in Virgil’s Eclogues, “Classic Philology” 1971, 66.
Pieri B., Caeci stimuli amoris: il lessico virgiliano dell’eros animale (e la lezione di Lucrezio), in: Le parole della passione: studi sul lessico poetico latino, eds. P. Mantovanelli, F.R. Berno, Bologna 2011.
Priou A., Hesiod: Man, Law and Cosmos, “Polis” 2014, 31.
Romano E., La poesia didascalica: un genere in cerca di identità, in: Il vero condito: caratteri e ambiti della poesia didascalica nel mondo antico, eds. R. Colombo et al., Pavia 2019.
Schönbeck G., Der locus amoenus von Homer bis Horaz, Heidelberg 1962.
Sheid J., Les restaurations religieuses d’Octavien/Auguste, in: Le principat d’Auguste, eds. F. Hurlet, B. Mineo, Rennes 2009.
Thibodeau T., Playing the Farmer: Representations of Rural Life in Vergil’s Georgics, Berkeley–London 2011.
Van Noorden H., Playing Hesiod. The ‘Myth of the Races’ in Classical Antiquity, Cambridge 2015.
Wilkinson L.P., The Georgics of Virgil: A Critical Survey, Cambridge 1969.
Witek F., Vergils Landschaften. Versuch einer Typologie literarischer Landschaft, Hildesheim 2006.
Zanda E., Fighting Hydra-like Luxury: Sumptuary Regulation in the Roman Republic, London 2011.
Zhang W., The Poet as Educator in the Works and Days, “Classical Journal” 2009, 105.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/rh.2025.60.41-60
Date of publication: 2025-11-28 08:31:36
Date of submission: 2024-11-04 10:13:13
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Giampiero Scafoglio

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.